The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Concept of Representation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Representation is fundamentally a relationship of authorization.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“Thereby, actors receiving justifications might be motivated to act as good losers, to accept that they have lost, and move on (e.g., Pitkin 1967;Gutmann and Thompson 1996).”
From Artificial intelligence, transparency, and public decision-making: Why explanations are key when trying to produce perceived legitimacy (2020) · cites this paper as Pitkin 1967
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kymlicka, W. (1996) · doi:10.1093/0198290918.001.0001 · Cited by 3,342
Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes"
Mansbridge, J. J. (1999) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2647821 · Cited by 3,037
Deliberative Democracy and Beyond
Dryzek, J. S. (2002) · doi:10.1093/019925043x.001.0001 · Cited by 1,815
Saward, M. (2006) · Contemporary Political Theory · doi:10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300234 · Cited by 1,471
Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Altman, D., Bernhard, M. H., Fish, S., Hicken, A. D., Kroenig, M., Lindberg, S. I., McMann, K. M., Paxton, P. M., et al. (2011) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592711000880 · Cited by 983
Metadata
- Authors
- Fenichel Pitkin, H.
- Venue
- University of California Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 1967-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4213160818
- Cited by
- 5,162
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 285 · 2025: 329 · 2024: 401 · 2023: 318 · 2022: 350 · 2021: 284 · 2020: 464 · 2019: 415 · 2018: 243 · 2017: 170 · 2016: 175 · 2015: 120 · 2014: 125 · 2013: 134 · 2012: 123
- FWCI
- 33.02
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of California Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Identity and Representation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Semiotics and Representation Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
- Keywords
- representation, concept of representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
