The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pain as Human Experience: An Anthropological Perspective
Abstract
Chronic pain challenges the central tenet of biomedicine: that objective knowledge of the human body and mind is possible apart from subjective experience and social context. Sufferers, finding that chronic pain alters every aspect of life, often become frustrated and distrust a profession seemingly unable to explain or effectively treat their illness. The authors of this innovative volume offer an entirely different, ethnographic approach, searching out more effective ways to describe and analyze the human context of pain. How can we analyze a mode of experience that appears to the pain sufferer as an unmediated fact of the body and is yet so resistant to language? With case studies drawn from anthropological investigations of chronic pain sufferers and pain clinics in the northeastern United States, the authors explore the great divide between the culturally shaped language of suffering and the traditional language of medical and psychological theorizing. They argue that the representation of experience in local social worlds is a central challenge to the human sciences and to ethnographic writing, and that meeting that challenge is also crucial to the refiguring of pain in medical discourse and health policy debates. Anthropologists, scholars from the medical social sciences and humanities, and many general readers will be interested in Pain as Human Experience . In addition, behavioral medicine and pain specialists, psychiatrists, and primary care practitioners will find much that is relevant to their work in this book.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Syndemics and public health: Reconceptualizing disease in bio-social context
Singer, M., & Clair, S. (2003) · Medical Anthropology Quarterly · doi:10.1525/maq.2003.17.4.423 · Cited by 1,140
Embodied Action, Enacted Bodies: the Example of Hypoglycaemia
Mol, A., & Law, J. (2004) · Body & Society · doi:10.1177/1357034x04042932 · Cited by 699
Toward a new architecture for global mental health
Kirmayer, L. J., & Pedersen, D. (2014) · Transcultural Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1363461514557202 · Cited by 330
The Anthropology of Ethics and Morality
Mattingly, C., & Throop, J. (2018) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050129 · Cited by 234
Barriers to Implementing the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview: A Qualitative Study
Aggarwal, N. K., Nicasio, A. V., DeSilva, R., Boiler, M., & Lewis-Fernández, R. (2013) · Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s11013-013-9325-z · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Venue
- University of California Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 1994-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4389382250
- Cited by
- 1,034
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.74
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pain as Human Experience: An Anthropological Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/9780520354722
- The paper
- Pain as Human Experience: An Anthropological Perspective. (1994). University of California Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520354722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.