The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Durable Inequality
Abstract
Charles Tilly, in this eloquent manifesto, presents a powerful new approach to the study of persistent social inequality. How, he asks, do long-lasting, systematic inequalities in life chances arise, and how do they come to distinguish members of different socially defined categories of persons? Exploring representative paired and unequal categories, such as male/female, black/white, and citizen/noncitizen, Tilly argues that the basic causes of these and similar inequalities greatly resemble one another. In contrast to contemporary analyses that explain inequality case by case, this account is one of process. Categorical distinctions arise, Tilly says, because they offer a solution to pressing organizational problems. Whatever the "organization" is—as small as a household or as large as a government—the resulting relationship of inequality persists because parties on both sides of the categorical divide come to depend on that solution, despite its drawbacks. Tilly illustrates the social mechanisms that create and maintain paired and unequal categories with a rich variety of cases, mapping out fertile territories for future relational study of durable inequality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brubaker, R. (2004) · Ethnicity, Nationalism, and Minority Rights · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511489235.004 · Cited by 1,303
Building Inclusive Markets in Rural Bangladesh: How Intermediaries Work Institutional Voids
Mair, J., Martí, I., & Ventresca, M. J. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0627 · Cited by 1,207
Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study
von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00050-7 · Cited by 1,025
Social Dominance Theory: Its Agenda and Method
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00401.x · Cited by 618
McAdam, D., & Scott, W. R. (2005) · Social Movements and Organization Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791000.003 · Cited by 516
Pyke, K. D. (2010) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1525/sop.2010.53.4.551 · Cited by 457
Bailey, D. E., Faraj, S., Hinds, P. J., Leonardi, P. M., & von Krogh, G. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1562 · Cited by 305
Capitals, assets, and resources: some critical issues 1
Savage, M., Warde, A., & Devine, F. (2005) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00045.x · Cited by 300
Organizational Approaches to Inequality: Inertia, Relative Power, and Environments
Stainback, K., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Skaggs, S. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120014 · Cited by 293
Monk, E. P. (2022) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/07352751221076863 · Cited by 209
The intersectional privilege of white able-bodied heterosexual men in STEM
Cech, E. A. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo1558 · Cited by 159
Limiting Dissent: The Mechanisms of State Repression in the USA
BOYKOFF, J. (2007) · Social Movement Studies · doi:10.1080/14742830701666988 · Cited by 138
Reconsidering the Reference Category
(2021) · doi:10.1177/0081175020982632 · Cited by 122
(2020) · doi:10.1093/restud/rdaa075 · Cited by 107
Why and how inequality matters.
McLeod, J. D. (2015) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/0022146515581619 · Cited by 51
The Traffic in Women: Notes on the “Political Economy” of Sex
(2012) · Deviations · doi:10.1215/9780822394068-002 · Cited by 43
PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE AMONG NATIONALLY FEDERATED SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
McCarthy, J. D. (2005) · Social Movements and Organization Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791000.011 · Cited by 37
Chavez, K., Weisshaar, K., & Cabello-Hutt, T. (2022) · Work and Occupations · doi:10.1177/07308884221094539 · Cited by 29
Beyond Three Faces: Toward an Integrated Social Psychology of Inequality
McLeod, J. D., Hallett, T., & Lively, K. J. (2015) · Advances in Group Processes · doi:10.1108/s0882-614520150000032001 · Cited by 20
Afro-ecuadorian responses to racism: between citizenship and corporatism
de la Torre, C. (2005) · Neither Enemies nor Friends · doi:10.1057/9781403982636_3 · Cited by 9
Dougherty, K. J. (2024) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/01614681241240287 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Tilly, C.
- Venue
- University of California Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 1998-03-02
- OpenAlex
- W4254775441
- Cited by
- 1,709
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 121.77
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.