The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From Genesis to Genetics: The Case of Evolution and Creationism
Abstract
The clash between evolution and creationism is one of the most hotly contested topics in education today. This book, written by one of America's most distinguished science educators, provides essential background information on this difficult and important controversy. Giving a sweeping and balanced historical look at both schools of thought, John A. Moore shows that faith can exist alongside science, that both are essential to human happiness and fulfillment, but that we must support the teaching of science and the scientific method in our nation's schools. This highly informative book will be an invaluable aid for parents, teachers, and lawmakers, as well as for anyone who wants a better understanding of this debate. From Genesis to Genetics shows us why we must free both science and religion to do the good work for which each is uniquely qualified. Using accessible language, Moore describes in depth these two schools of thought. He begins with an analysis of the Genesis story, examines other ancient creation myths, and provides a nuanced discussion of the history of biblical interpretation. After looking at the tenets and historical context of creationism, he presents the history of evolutionary thought, explaining how it was developed, what it means, and why it is such a powerful theory. Moore goes on to discuss the relationship of nineteenth-century religion to Darwinism, examine the historic Scopes trial, and take us up to the current controversy over what to teach in s…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The fossil record does not actually show the process of change of one species into another because fossils are not living and do not mutate, reproduce, and undergo selection.
“The fossil record particularly does”
From What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth (2003) · cites this paper as Moore 2002
Evolution is a historical science, which means very little can be verified by direct observation.
“For example, biologist John Moore (2002:90) recently observed,”
From What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth (2003) · cites this paper as Moore 2002
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth
O'Brien, M. J., Lyman, R. L., & Leonard, R. D. (2003) · American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/3557109 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, J. A.
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 2002-01-24
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review