The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History
Abstract
In this closely integrated collection of essays on colonialism in world history, Frederick Cooper raises crucial questions about concepts relevant to a wide range of issues in the social sciences and humanities, including identity, globalization, and modernity. Rather than portray the past two centuries as the inevitable movement from empire to nation-state, Cooper places nationalism within a much wider range of imperial and diasporic imaginations, of rulers and ruled alike, well into the twentieth century. He addresses both the insights and the blind spots of colonial studies in an effort to get beyond the tendency in the field to focus on a generic colonialism located sometime between 1492 and the 1960s and somewhere in the "West." Broad-ranging, cogently argued, and with a historical focus that moves from Africa to South Asia to Europe, these essays, most published here for the first time, propose a fuller engagement in the give-and-take of history, not least in the ways in which concepts usually attributed to Western universalism—including citizenship and equality—were defined and reconfigured by political mobilizations in colonial contexts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Comparative work across different time frames has been relatively rare, although it seems to be increasing in frequency within the fields of archaeology and history, possibly motivated by a growing interest in the analytic of capitalism driven by postcolonial theory.
“Despite this general point of agreement, comparative work across different time frames has been relatively rare, although seems to be increasing in frequency within the fields of archaeology and history, possibly motivated by a growing interest in the analytic of capitalism driven by postcolonial theory (Cooper 2005).”
From The Archaeology of Capitalism in Colonial Contexts, an Introduction: Provincializing Historical Archaeology (2011) · cites this paper as Cooper 2005
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Muslim Belonging in Secular India: Negotiating Citizenship in Postcolonial Hyderabad
Sherman, T. C. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316154953 · Cited by 91
Croucher, S. K., & Weiss, L. (2011) · Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0192-6_1 · Cited by 20
Globalization and the spread of capitalism: material resonances
Horning, A., & Schweickart, E. (2016) · Post-Medieval Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00794236.2016.1169490 · Cited by 10
Becoming “Rebels” and “Idolaters” in the Valley of Volcanoes, Southern Peru
Menaker, A. (2019) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-018-0482-1 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, F.
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 2005-06-06
- Cited by
- 1,469
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review