Cited by 93Chinese history and philosophyNonprofit Sector and VolunteeringHistorical Economic and Social Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Art of Doing Good: Charity in Late Ming China

Smith, Joanna H·2009·University of California Press eBooks

Abstract

An unprecedented passion for saving lives swept through late Ming society, giving rise to charitable institutions that transcended family, class, and religious boundaries. Analyzing lecture transcripts, administrative guidelines, didactic tales, and diaries, Joanna Handlin Smith abandons the facile explanation that charity was a response to poverty and social unrest and examines the social and economic changes that stimulated the fervor for doing good. With an eye for telling details and a finesse in weaving the voices of her subjects into her narrative, Smith brings to life the hard choices that five men faced when deciding whom to help, how to organize charitable distributions, and how to balance their communities' needs against the interests of family and self. She thus shifts attention from tired questions about whether the Chinese had a tradition of charity (they did) to analyzing the nature of charity itself. Skillfully organized and engaging, The Art of Doing Good moves from discussions about moral leadership and beliefs to scrutiny of the daily operation of soup kitchens and medical dispensaries, and from examining local society to generalizing about the just use of resources and the role of social networks in charitable giving. Smith's work will transform our thinking about the boundaries between social classes in late imperial China and about charity in general.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/9780520943506

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During the Ming and Qing periods, a new tradition of religiously inspired lay charities called shantang emerged.

    “During the Ming (1368 -1644) and Qing (1644 -1911) periods, these efforts were joined by a new tradition of religiously inspired lay charities called shantang 善 棠 (benevolent associations) (Fuma, 2008; Smith, 1987; Smith, 2009).”

    From Before the NGO: Chinese Charities in Historical Perspective (2015) · cites this paper as Smith, 2009

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 93

Metadata

Authors
Smith, J. H.
Corresponding author
Smith, Joanna H
Venue
University of California Press eBooks
Published
2009-12-31
OpenAlex
W4387485599
Cited by
93
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.39
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of California Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
Keywords
charity, late Ming dynasty, charitable institutions, soup kitchens, medical dispensary, social networks, moral leadership, social class boundaries, resource allocation, charitable giving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review