The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
THE SUPERORGANIC
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The idea of status as structural position originated in the conceptualization of social structure as comprising culturally de fi ned institutions.”
From Status and Role: Structural Aspects (2015) · cites this paper as Kroeber, 1917
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- KROEBER, A. L.
- Affiliations
- University of California System (US)
- Corresponding author
- KROEBER, A. L.
- Venue
- American Anthropologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1917-04-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-213
- ISSN
- 0002-7294 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1433
- OpenAlex
- W4233719240
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Anthropologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Cultural and Mythological Studies
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Keywords
- organicism, social organization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
