Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 956

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology

BERLIN, BRENT, BREEDLOVE, DENNIS E., RAVEN, PETER H.·1973·American Anthropologist

Abstract

Since about 1954, modern field research has been carried out by a number of ethnographers and biologists in an effort to understand more fully the nature of folk biological classification. Much of this work has been devoted to studies dealing with the naming and classification of plants and animals in non‐Western societies. It has now become apparent that several important and far reaching generalizations can be formulated which promise to throw considerable light on prescientific man's understanding of his biological universe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00140

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 956

Metadata

Authors
BERLIN, B., BREEDLOVE, D. E., & RAVEN, P. H.
Venue
American Anthropologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1973-02
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
214-242
ISSN
  • 0002-7294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1433
OpenAlex
W2091355796
Cited by
956
References
0
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00140
The paper
BERLIN, B., BREEDLOVE, D. E., & RAVEN, P. H. (1973). General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology. American Anthropologist. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00140

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.