Feasting, Craft Specialization, and the Ritual Mode of Production in Small‐Scale Societies
Abstract
Economic intensification has been documented in a diversity of small‐scale societies. The existing archaeological theory concerning such intensification has tended to privilege economic and political explanations and largely ignores social action and ritual performance as motivations for economic change. In this article, 1 use both ethnographic and archaeological data to argue that ceremonial feasting and the need for socially valued goods, which are critical for ritual performance and necessary for a variety of social transactions, create the demand that underwrites and sustains economic intensification in small‐scale societies. Food for large‐scale feasts is acquired through the intensification of food production and procurement targeted specifically for feasting, rather than from the surplus available from routine subsistence production. Large‐scale demands for socially valued goods tend to result in specialization on the production of "extraordinary" material culture, which is characterized by two modes of circulation, in networks of social obligations or as offerings in sacred locations. [Key words.craft specialization, exchange, feasting, ritual]
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neolithic society is typical of what Spielmann (2002) has called the 'ritual mode of production', in which ritual was an end in itself.
“This is typical of what Spielmann (2002) has called the “ritual mode of production”, in which ritual was an end in itself.”
From Art (Pre)History: Ritual, Narrative and Visual Culture in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe (2020) · cites this paper as Spielmann (2002)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 88 · Cited by 341
- Authors
- Spielmann, K. A.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Spielmann, Katherine A.
- Venue
- American Anthropologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 195-207
- ISSN
- 0002-7294 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1433
- OpenAlex
- W2138031628
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 45.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Anthropologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Keywords
- craft specialization, ritual economy, economic intensification, small-scale societies, offerings, sacred sites, social obligations, exchange networks, food production, ritual performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review