Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Some Intellectual Genealogies for the Concept of Everyday Resistance

SIVARAMAKRISHNAN, K.·2005·American Anthropologist
DOI 10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.346
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Concerns with how cultural factors influenced agrarian social change remained an abiding interest in the work of James Scott. I begin by sketching out the context of debates in Marxist theory, development studies, and social and political anthropology that, during the 1980s, turned to relations between ideas, power, and processes of conflict and change in a world of new postcolonial nations and rapid agrarian development. In the article, then, I carefully examine the ideas Scott developed about resistance and hegemony in conversation with the work of E. P. Thompson. Tracing the genealogy of Scott's ideas about hegemony and rural social protest, I comment in some detail on the literature on resistance that arose in anthropology during the 1980s and the role of Scott's Weapons of the Weak (1985) in shaping that literature while interacting with Subaltern Studies (Guha 1982–87), studies of social movements, and examinations of power in interpersonal relations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.346

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Anderson Perry, 1977, Transitions from Antiquity to Feudalism
  2. Bloch Marc, 1961, Feudal Society, vol.1: The Growth of Ties of Dependence
  3. Blok Anton, 1972, The Mafia of a Sicilian Village (1860‐1960): An Anthropological Study of Political Middlemen
  4. Chatterjee Partha, 2004, Empire after Globalization Economic and Political Weekly, 39, 4155
  5. Chaturvedi Vinayak, 2000, Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial
  6. Desan Suzanne, 1989, The New Cultural History, 47
  7. Guha Ranajit, 1982, Subaltern Studies: Writings on South Asian History and Society, vols. 1‐5
  8. Haynes Douglas, 1992, Contesting Power: Resistance and Everyday Social Relations in South Asia, 1
  9. Hegel G. W. F., 1977, The Phenomenology of the Spirit
  10. Hobsbawm Eric, 1981, Bandits
  11. Hobsbawm Eric, 1968, Captain Swing
  12. 10.2307/1860957 · DOI
  13. Ludden David, 2001, Reading Subaltern Studies: Critical History, Contesting Meaning, and the Globalization of South Asia
  14. Scott James C., 1999, Foreword. In Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India. Ranajit Guha, au
  15. Siu Helen F., 1989, Agents and Victims in South China: Accomplices in Rural Revolt
  16. Thompson E. P., 1975, Albion's Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth Century England, 255
  17. Thompson E. P., 1975, Whigs and Hunters: The Origins of the Black Act
  18. Williams Raymond, 1973, The Country and the City
  19. Wolf Eric, 1966, Peasants

Cited by

See all 52

Metadata

Authors
SIVARAMAKRISHNAN, K.
Venue
American Anthropologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
346-355
ISSN
  • 0002-7294
  • 1548-1433
DOI
10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.346
Cited by
52
References
60
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 858 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Intellectual Genealogies for the Concept of Everyday Resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.346
The paper
SIVARAMAKRISHNAN, K. (2005). Some Intellectual Genealogies for the Concept of Everyday Resistance. American Anthropologist. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.346

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.