Cited by 19Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesIndigenous Cultures and HistoryAmazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory

Powhatan's Werowocomoco: Constructing Place, Polity, and Personhood in the Chesapeake, C.E. 1200‐‐C.E. 1609

GALLIVAN, MARTIN D.·2007·American Anthropologist

Abstract

Colonial encounters within the Powhatan village of Werowocomoco in Tidewater Virginia have captured the public's imagination through romantic literature and popular films. Shifting the focus of inquiry away from English colonial narratives and toward a history of landscape provides an alternative understanding of Werowocomoco as a Native place. Archaeological investigation has identified evidence of earthworks and related social practices that altered Werowocomoco's built environment and subjective experiences of its spaces in ways that colonial chroniclers failed to appreciate. A landscape history combining built environments, cognitive maps, and spatial practices across the historic—precontact divide indicates that the settlement became a ritualized location for the production of political status and social personhood well before English colonization in the Chesapeake. Spatial practices rooted in Algonquian cosmology and centered on Werowocomoco shaped the origins of the Powhatan chiefdom and early colonial history through which Powhatans sought to incorporate Jamestown colonists into their world. A biography of Werowocomoco as a Native place illustrates how a deep historical anthropology may challenge notions of a “prehistoric” past comprised of homogenized societies lacking history.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/aa.2007.109.1.85

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Werowocomoco was redefined as a ritualized and politicized node within a landscape of similar places built by Algonquian communities across the Chesapeake after AD 1200.

    “Drawing on social theories of landscape and ''place-making'' (e.g., Basso 1996, p. 5), my colleagues and I have suggested that Werowocomoco was redefined as a ritualized and politicized node within a landscape of similar such places constructed by Algonquian communities across the Chesapeake after AD 1200 (Gallivan 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GALLIVAN, M. D.
Affiliations
William & Mary (US)
Corresponding author
GALLIVAN, MARTIN D.
Venue
American Anthropologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
85-100
ISSN
  • 0002-7294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1433
OpenAlex
W2048720707
Cited by
19
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Anthropologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
Keywords
Tidewater Virginia, earthworks, landscape history, cognitive maps, spatial practices, political status, social personhood, Jamestown

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review