Powhatan's Werowocomoco: Constructing Place, Polity, and Personhood in the Chesapeake, C.E. 1200‐‐C.E. 1609
Abstract
Colonial encounters within the Powhatan village of Werowocomoco in Tidewater Virginia have captured the public's imagination through romantic literature and popular films. Shifting the focus of inquiry away from English colonial narratives and toward a history of landscape provides an alternative understanding of Werowocomoco as a Native place. Archaeological investigation has identified evidence of earthworks and related social practices that altered Werowocomoco's built environment and subjective experiences of its spaces in ways that colonial chroniclers failed to appreciate. A landscape history combining built environments, cognitive maps, and spatial practices across the historic—precontact divide indicates that the settlement became a ritualized location for the production of political status and social personhood well before English colonization in the Chesapeake. Spatial practices rooted in Algonquian cosmology and centered on Werowocomoco shaped the origins of the Powhatan chiefdom and early colonial history through which Powhatans sought to incorporate Jamestown colonists into their world. A biography of Werowocomoco as a Native place illustrates how a deep historical anthropology may challenge notions of a “prehistoric” past comprised of homogenized societies lacking history.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Werowocomoco was redefined as a ritualized and politicized node within a landscape of similar places built by Algonquian communities across the Chesapeake after AD 1200.
“Drawing on social theories of landscape and ''place-making'' (e.g., Basso 1996, p. 5), my colleagues and I have suggested that Werowocomoco was redefined as a ritualized and politicized node within a landscape of similar such places constructed by Algonquian communities across the Chesapeake after AD 1200 (Gallivan 2007).”
From The Archaeology of Native Societies in the Chesapeake: New Investigations and Interpretations (2011) · cites this paper as Gallivan 2007
Cites
Drought as a factor in the Jamestown colony, 1607–1612
Blanton, D. B. (2000) · Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/bf03374329 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Archaeology of Native Societies in the Chesapeake: New Investigations and Interpretations
Gallivan, M. (2011) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-010-9048-4 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- GALLIVAN, M. D.
- Affiliations
- William & Mary (US)
- Corresponding author
- GALLIVAN, MARTIN D.
- ORCID
- GALLIVAN, MARTIN D.
- Venue
- American Anthropologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-100
- ISSN
- 0002-7294 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1433
- OpenAlex
- W2048720707
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Anthropologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
- Keywords
- Tidewater Virginia, earthworks, landscape history, cognitive maps, spatial practices, political status, social personhood, Jamestown
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review