when talk isn't cheap: language and political economy
Abstract
Although the classic Saussurean conception of language segregates the linguistic sign from the material world, this paper shows linguistic phenomena playing many roles in political economy. Linguistic signs may refer to aspects of an exchange system; differentiated ways of speaking may index social groups in a social division of labor; and linguistic “goods” may enter the marketplace as objects of exchange. These aspects of language are not mutually exclusive, but (instead) may coincide in the same stretch of discourse. Illustrations are drawn primarily from a rural Wolof community in Senegal. It is argued that linguistic signs are part of a political economy, not just vehicles for thinking about it. Only a conception of language as multifunctional can give an adequate view of the relations between language and the material world, and evade a false dichotomy between “idealists” and “materialists.”[language, political economy, sociolinguistics, semiotic theory, Senegal]
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This seeming contradiction shows the complexity of language ideologies and the factors affecting them.
“This seeming contradiction shows the complexity of language ideologies and the factors affecting them (Irvine, 1989).”
From "We Want Them All to Speak in English … So, no Spanish": Preservice Teachers’ Language Ideologies Towards Emergent Bilinguals (2023) · cites this paper as Irvine, 1989
The finding that PSTs' language ideologies are multiple and contradictory aligns with previous literature.
“The findings of this align with the previous literature on language ideologies in that they appear to be multiple and contradictory in nature (Barbosa, 2020; Fitzsimmons-Doolan et al., 2017; Irvine, 1989; Kroskrity, 2004; Lew & Siffrinn, 2019; Palmer, 2011; Zúñiga, 2016)”
From "We Want Them All to Speak in English … So, no Spanish": Preservice Teachers’ Language Ideologies Towards Emergent Bilinguals (2023) · cites this paper as Irvine, 1989
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 37 · Cited by 1,270
- Authors
- IRVINE, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Brandeis University (US)
- Corresponding author
- IRVINE, JUDITH T.
- ORCID
- IRVINE, JUDITH T.
- Venue
- American Ethnologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 248-267
- ISSN
- 0094-0496 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1425
- OpenAlex
- W2051250136
- Cited by
- 1,270
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 28.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Ethnologist (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language and Culture
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Keywords
- linguistic sign, language as commodity, social division of labor, social stratification, Wolof, Senegal, materialism and idealism, Saussurean semiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review