The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of the North American Breeding Bird Survey Using Hierarchical Models
Abstract
We analyzed population change for 420 bird species from the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) using a hierarchical log-linear model and compared the results with those obtained through route-regression analysis. Survey-wide trend estimates based on the hierarchical model were generally more precise than estimates from the earlier analysis. No consistent pattern of differences existed in the magnitude of trends between the analysis methods. Survey-wide trend estimates changed substantially for 15 species between route-regression and hierarchical-model analyses. We compared regional estimates for states, provinces, and Bird Conservation Regions; differences observed in these regional analyses are likely a consequence of the route-regression procedure's inadequate accommodation of temporal differences in survey effort. We used species-specific hierarchical-model results to estimate composite change for groups of birds associated with major habitats and migration types. Grassland, aridland, and eastern-forest-obligate bird species declined, whereas urban—suburban species increased over the interval 1968–2008. No migration status group experienced significant changes, although Nearctic—Neotropical migrant species showed intervals of decline and permanent resident species increased almost 20% during the interval. Hierarchical-model results better portrayed patterns of population change over time than route-regression results. We recommend use of hierarchical models for BBS analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Decline of the North American avifauna
Rosenberg, K. V., Dokter, A. M., Blancher, P. J., Sauer, J. R., Smith, A. C., Smith, P. A., Stanton, J. C., Panjabi, A., Helft, L., Parr, M., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw1313 · Cited by 2,094
Self-citationThe eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science
Sullivan, B. L., Aycrigg, J. L., Barry, J. H., Bonney, R. E., Bruns, N., Cooper, C. B., Damoulas, T., Dhondt, A. A., Dietterich, T., Farnsworth, A., et al. (2014) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.003 · Cited by 1,155
The North American Breeding Bird Survey 1966–2011: Summary Analysis and Species Accounts
Sauer, J. R., Link, W. A., Fallon, J. E., Pardieck, K. L., & Ziolkowski, D. J. (2013) · North American Fauna · doi:10.3996/nafa.79.0001 · Cited by 345
Self-citationSynthesizing multiple data types for biological conservation using integrated population models
Zipkin, E. F., & Saunders, S. P. (2018) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.017 · Cited by 286
The first 50 years of the North American Breeding Bird Survey
Sauer, J. R., Pardieck, K. L., Ziolkowski, D. J., Smith, A. C., Hudson, M.-A. R., Rodriguez, V., Berlanga, H., Niven, D. K., & Link, W. A. (2017) · The Condor · doi:10.1650/condor-17-83.1 · Cited by 285
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sauer, J. R., & Link, W. A.
- Venue
- The Auk
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-98
- ISSN
- 0004-8038 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-4254
- OpenAlex
- W2104018362
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of the North American Breeding Bird Survey Using Hierarchical Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/auk.2010.09220
- The paper
- Sauer, J. R., & Link, W. A. (2011). Analysis of the North American Breeding Bird Survey Using Hierarchical Models. The Auk. https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2010.09220
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.