The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Retention Forestry to Maintain Multifunctional Forests: A World Perspective
Open accessAbstract
The majority of the world's forests are used for multiple purposes, which often include the potentially conflicting goals of timber production and biodiversity conservation. A scientifically validated management approach that can reduce such conflicts is retention forestry, an approach modeled on natural processes, which emerged in the last 25 years as an alternative to clearcutting. A portion of the original stand is left unlogged to maintain the continuity of structural and compositional diversity. We detail retention forestry's ecological role, review its current practices, and summarize the large research base on the subject. Retention forestry is applicable to all forest biomes, complements conservation in reserves, and represents bottom-up conservation through forest manager involvement. A research challenge is to identify thresholds for retention amounts to achieve desired outcomes. We define key issues for future development and link retention forestry with land-zoning allocation at various scales, expanding its uses to forest restoration and the management of uneven-age forests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Environmental Forest Policies
McDermott, C., Cashore, B., & Kanowski, P. (2010) · doi:10.4324/9781849774925 · Cited by 147
Cited by
The living dead: acknowledging life after tree death to stop forest degradation
Thorn, S., Seibold, S., Leverkus, A. B., Michler, T., Müller, J., Noss, R. F., Stork, N., Vogel, S., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.2252 · Cited by 163
Self-citationFrom field surveys to LiDAR: Shining a light on how bats respond to forest structure
Froidevaux, J. S. P., Zellweger, F., Bollmann, K., Jones, G., & Obrist, M. K. (2016) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.038 · Cited by 110
Loss of temporal structure of tropical soundscapes with intensifying land use in Borneo
Burivalova, Z., Maeda, T. M., Purnomo, Rayadin, Y., Boucher, T., Choksi, P., Roe, P., Truskinger, A., & Game, E. T. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158268 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Gustafsson, L., Baker, S. C., Bauhus, J., Beese, W. J., Brodie, A., Kouki, J., Lindenmayer, D. B., Lõhmus, A., Pastur, G. M., Messier, C., Neyland, M., Palik, B., Sverdrup-Thygeson, A., Volney, W. J. A., Wayne, A., & Franklin, J. F.
- Venue
- BioScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 633-645
- ISSN
- 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3244
- OpenAlex
- W2113283046
- Cited by
- 839
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retention Forestry to Maintain Multifunctional Forests: A World Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/bio.2012.62.7.6
- The paper
- Gustafsson, L., Baker, S. C., Bauhus, J., Beese, W. J., Brodie, A., Kouki, J., Lindenmayer, D. B., Lõhmus, A., Pastur, G. M., Messier, C., Neyland, M., Palik, B., Sverdrup-Thygeson, A., Volney, W. J. A., Wayne, A., & Franklin, J. F. (2012). Retention Forestry to Maintain Multifunctional Forests: A World Perspective. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.7.6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.