Cited by 73Rangeland and Wildlife ManagementAvian ecology and behaviorWildlife Ecology and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Common Raven Activity in Relation to Land use in Western Wyoming: Implications for Greater Sage-Grouse Reproductive Success

Open access

Abstract

Resumen.Los cambios en el paisaje de origen antropogénico pueden favorecer especies generalistas adaptadas a asentamientos humanos, como el cuervo Corvus corax, al proveer nuevos recursos.Luego, el aumento de la densidad de depredadores puede afectar negativamente a las presas, especialmente a las especies de presas raras o sensibles.Jackson Hole y la parte superior del valle del río Green en el oeste de Wyoming están experimentando tasas aceleradas de desarrollo humano debido a emprendimientos turísticos y de gas natural.El aumento de las poblaciones de C. corax en estas áreas puede influenciar de forma negativa a Centrocercus urophasianus, una especie sensible y especialista de matorrales de Artemisia.Investigamos patrones de comportamiento y distribución de Corvus corax a escala de paisaje y la correlación de los cuervos con el éxito reproductivo de Centrocercus urophasianus en el oeste de Wyoming.En nuestra área de estudio, las ciudades proveen alimento, agua y sitios de anidación suplementarios a los cuervos.Esto da como resultado el aumento de las densidades reproductivas locales pero con movimientos aparentemente limitados ( 3 km) por parte de los cuervos desde las ciudades hacia las áreas no desarrolladas de matorrales de Artemisia.La mayor densidad y ocupación de Corvus corax fue observada en tipos de coberturas de suelo con actividades humanas frecuentes.En los matorrales de Artemisia con poca actividad humana, la densidad de cuervos fue levemente elevada cerca de las áreas de incubación y cría de Centrocercus urophasianus, comparada con la densidad esperada y observada en matorrales de Artemisia que no presentan individuos de C. urophasianus.La ocupación de cuervos en las proximidades de las áreas de cría de C. urophasianus tuvo una mejor correlación con el éxito de C. urophasianus que la densidad y el comportamiento de los cuervos.Esto sugiere que la mayor parte de la depredación por parte de los cuervos es realizada por individuos territoriales residentes.El mejoramiento integrado de los matorrales de Artemisia a nivel regional, la remoción de subsidios antropogénicos y quizás también la remoción o condicionamiento por aversión de los cuervos agresivos podrían beneficiar a las poblaciones de C. urophasianus en nuestra área de estudio.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/cond.2010.090132

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 53 · Cited by 73

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. BOARMAN, W. I., M. A. PATTEN, R. J. CAMP, AND S. J. COLLIS. 2006. Ecology of a population of subsidized predators: Common Ravens in the central Mojave Desert, California. Journal of Arid Environ- ments 67: 248-261.
  2. BRAUN, C.E. 1998. Sage Grouse declines in western North America: what are the problems? Proceedings of the Western Association of State Fish and Wildlife Agencies 78:139-156.
  3. CLARK, T. W., M. B. RUTHERFORD, AND D. CASEY (EDS.). 2005. Coex- isting with large carnivores. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  4. COATES, P. S., J. W. CONNELLY, AND D. J. DELEHANTY. 2008. Preda- tors of Greater Sage-Grouse nests identified by video monitor- ing. Journal of Field Ornithology 79:421-428.
  5. COATES, P. S., AND D. J. DELEHANTY. In press. Nest predation of Greater Sage-Grouse in relation to microhabitat factors and pred- ators. Journal of Wildlife Management.
  6. CONNELLY, J. W., M. A. SCHROEDER, A. R. SANDS, AND C. E. BRAUN. 2000. Guidelines to manage Sage Grouse populations and their habitats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:967-985.
  7. JIMÉNEZ, J. E., AND M. R. CONOVER. 2001. Ecological approaches to reduce predation on ground-nesting gamebirds and their nests. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:62-69.
  8. KNIGHT, R. L., AND J. Y. KAWASHIMA. 1993. Responses of raven and Red-tailed Hawk populations to linear right-of-ways. Journal of Wildlife Management 57:266-271.
  9. LUGINBUHL, J. M., J. M. MARZLUFF, J. E. BRADLEY, M. G. RAPHAEL, AND D. E. VARLAND. 2001. Corvid survey techniques and the relationship between corvid relative abundance and nest preda- tion. Journal of Field Ornithology 72:556-572.
  10. LYON, A. G., AND S. H. ANDERSON. 2003. Potential gas development impacts on Sage Grouse nest initiation and movement. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31:486-491.
  11. MACKENZIE, D. I., J. D. NICHOLS, J. A. ROYLE, K. H. POLLOCK, L. L. BAILEY, AND J. E. HINES. 2006. Occupancy estimation and mod- eling: inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence. Elsevier, San Diego.
  12. MARZLUFF, J. M., AND R. P. BALDA. 1992. The Pinyon Jay: behav- ioral ecology of a colonial and cooperative corvid. Academic Press, San Diego.
  13. OMLAND, K. E., C. L. TARR, W. I. BOARMAN, J. M. MARZLUFF, AND R. C. FLEISCHER. 2000. Cryptic genetic variation and paraphyly in ravens. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267: 2475-2482.
  14. SCHROEDER, M. A., AND R. K. BAYDACK. 2001. Predation and the man- agement of prairie grouse. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:24-32.
  15. In R. L. Knight, F. W. Smith, S. W. Bus- kirk, W. H. Romme, and W. L. Baker [EDS.], Fragmentation in the central Rocky Mountains. University Press of Colorado, Boul- der, CO.

Metadata

Authors
Bui, T.-V. D., Marzluff, J. M., & Bedrosian, B.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Marzluff, John M.
Venue
The Condor
Published
2010-02
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
65-78
ISSN
  • 0010-5422 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5129
OpenAlex
W2043914839
Cited by
73
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ornithological Applications (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Washington
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
Corvus corax, Centrocercus urophasianus, land use, sagebrush habitat, predator-prey interactions, nest predation, reproductive success, urbanization, human disturbance, sagebrush restoration, sagebrush steppe, territoriality, Jackson Hole, Wyoming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common Raven Activity in Relation to Land use in Western Wyoming: Implications for Greater Sage-Grouse Reproductive Success. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/cond.2010.090132
The paper
Bui, T.-V. D., Marzluff, J. M., & Bedrosian, B. (2010). Common Raven Activity in Relation to Land use in Western Wyoming: Implications for Greater Sage-Grouse Reproductive Success. The Condor. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2010.090132