The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coping With Innocence After Death Row
Open accessAbstract
Kennedy Brewer spent 13 years behind bars seven on death row for the rape and murder of a 3-year-old girl. On February 15, 2008, he became the 127th death row inmate in the United States exonerated and released from prison.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A formal apology can allow the wrongfully convicted to shed their 'spoiled identity' because it removes residual suspicion and destigmatises them as 'innocent' (Westervelt & Cook, 2008).”
From The Zemiological Afterlife of Wrongful Conviction: Spoiled Identity, Repair and Survivorship (2024) · cites this paper as Westervelt & Cook, 2008
In the citing paper
“By tracking the less visible long-term harms that the 'sustained catastrophe' (Westervelt & Cook, 2008) of wrongful conviction brings, these memoirs are well placed to illuminate the large body of Naughton's zemiological iceberg that remains hidden under the water level.”
From The Zemiological Afterlife of Wrongful Conviction: Spoiled Identity, Repair and Survivorship (2024) · cites this paper as Westervelt & Cook, 2008
In the citing paper
“It empowers victims to 'speak for themselves' (McGarry & Walklate, 2015:4), to 'make sense' of how their experience has changed them as a person (Green et al., 2021), to educate others about their experience (Westervelt & Cook, 2008;Westlund, 2018) and to challenge ongoing and future abuses of power (Savage et al., 2007;Hearty, 2021).”
From The Zemiological Afterlife of Wrongful Conviction: Spoiled Identity, Repair and Survivorship (2024) · cites this paper as Westervelt & Cook, 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity
(1969) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.45.527.642 · Cited by 14,255
Psychological Consequences of Wrongful Conviction and Imprisonment
Grounds, A. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice · doi:10.3138/cjccj.46.2.165 · Cited by 140
The Burden of Innocence: Coping with a Wrongful Imprisonment
Campbell, K., & Denov, M. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice · doi:10.3138/cjccj.46.2.139 · Cited by 97
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203782682 · Cited by 8
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Michael L. Radelet, 1992, In Spite of Innocence
Cited by
Brooks, S. K., & Greenberg, N. (2021) · Medicine, Science and the Law · doi:10.1177/0025802420949069 · Cited by 74
Cultural consequences of miscarriages of justice
Cole, S. A. (2009) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.874 · Cited by 20
The Zemiological Afterlife of Wrongful Conviction: Spoiled Identity, Repair and Survivorship
Hearty, K. (2024) · Critical Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10612-023-09737-1 · Cited by 2
“The exoneration of the wrongfully convicted might seem like the ultimate success for any innocence project, yet the enduring image of the wrongfully convicted smiling defiantly upon release masks how release presents new challenges (Westervelt & Cook, 2008; Madrigal & Norris, 2022).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Westervelt, S. D., & Cook, K. J.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina Wilmington (US)
- ORCID
- Cook, Kimberly J.
- Venue
- Contexts
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 32-37
- ISSN
- 1536-5042 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6052
- OpenAlex
- W2022642846
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- libres.uncg.edu
- Locations
- Contexts (publishedVersion)
- NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Torture, Ethics, and Law
- Keywords
- death row, wrongful convictions, exoneration, childhood innocence, rape and murder, death penalty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
