Cited by 126Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentIndigenous Knowledge Systems and AgricultureEducation and Art Integration

Co-creation of knowledge in agroecology

Open access
Utter, Alisha, White, Alissa, Méndez, V. Ernesto, Morris, Katlyn·2021·Elementa Science of the Anthropocene

Abstract

The co-creation of knowledge is gaining recognition and use within the science, practice, and movement of agroecology. Knowledge co-creation fosters participatory learning and development, which differs from passive knowledge sharing. This approach can bridge the real and perceived gaps across diverse forms of knowledge, including what is often distinguished as farmers’ traditional, Indigenous, tacit, or local knowledge and experts’ scientific, western, or generalizable knowledge. Formal academic documentation of processes and outcomes related to knowledge co-creation is limited; therefore, we bring in examples of published research, drawing from fields of agroecology, participatory action research, and science and technology studies, along with a firsthand farmer perspective on co-creation. Combined, these frameworks offer insight into the potential benefits of knowledge co-creation in agroecology. Many of these challenges, such as navigating power dynamics, may be addressed through mindful research and community practices, including strong communication and transparent expectations and goals. Co-creation processes have traditionally and continually taken place between farmers and throughout communities without academic acknowledgment and/or interpretation of such. We reinstate the invaluable role of farmer-centered inquiry, understanding, and application, which offer benefits to individual farmers and their extended communities of practice and research, in addition to holding spiritual and cultural significance. The co-creation of knowledge in agroecology presents a compelling, adaptive approach and outcome for the increasingly complex challenges facing farmers and the agrifood system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/elementa.2021.00026

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 126

Authors
Utter, A., White, A., Méndez, V. E., & Morris, K.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Venue
Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
Published
2021
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
2325-1026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3212395347
Cited by
126
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 7
FWCI
18.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Elementa Science of the Anthropocene (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Art Integration
Keywords
knowledge co-creation, agroecology, participatory action research, science and technology studies, farmer knowledge, indigenous knowledge, tacit knowledge, power dynamics in research, communities of practice, knowledge gaps, agri-food systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review