The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bodies of/as Evidence in Autoethnography
Abstract
Qualitative researchers are aptly positioned to address issues implicated in the politics of evidence in scholarship. Autoethnography in particular carries important methodological implications for how the body is sited in what constitutes knowledge, evidence, and the evidence of knowledge. I argue that if autoethnography is epistemic, then the evidence of how we know what we know must reside in the aesthetic crafting of critical reflexion upon the body-as-evidence. As we develop “post” methodologies we may be in danger of expecting the personal or emotional to stand in for literary acumen. Performative autoethnography resides in the intersections of knowledge construction and art, in the aesthetic articulation of the performative body, in a personally political reflection whose evidence is an epistemic/aesthetic praxis. I utilize autoethnographic writing on loss and hope to operationalize the epistemic/aesthetic praxis as an ethical imperative for performative autoethnography.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Auto-ethnography has the power to reveal the understory of hegemonic systems.
“This experiential and reflexive practice, as Tami Spry (2009) notes, has the power to reveal the understory of hegemonic systems.”
From The Margin Speaks: On the Radical Possibilities of Embodied Knowledge as Decolonial Pedagogy (2022) · cites this paper as Spry 2009
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Conquergood Dwight, 1998, The Future of Performance Studies: Visions and Revisions., 25
- Conquergood Dwight, 2004, The Performance Studies Reader., 311
- 10.4135/9781412985390 · DOI
- Dickinson Emily, 1981, The American Tradition in Literature 5th Ed.
- 10.1080/10462930500362445 · DOI
- Kingsolver Barbara, 2003, Small Wonder: Essays.
- Madison D. Soyini, 2005, Critical Ethnography: Methods, Ethics, and Performance., 10.4135/9781452233826 · DOI
- 10.1080/10462939909366254 · DOI
- 10.1177/1077800407304413 · DOI
- 10.1177/1532708605279694 · DOI
- 10.1080/10462930009366280 · DOI
- Pollock Della, 1998, The Ends of Performance., 73
- Spry Tami, 2004, An autoethnography performed in various venues across the country
- 10.1080/10462930600828790 · DOI
- Spry Tami, 1998, The Future of Performance Studies: Visions and Revisions, 254
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Margin Speaks: On the Radical Possibilities of Embodied Knowledge as Decolonial Pedagogy
McKinson, K. (2022) · Cultural Anthropology · doi:10.14506/ca37.3.03 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Spry, T.
- Venue
- International Review of Qualitative Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 603-610
- ISSN
- 1940-8447
- 1940-8455
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review