Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsDecolonial Thought and EpistemologiesFeminist Epistemology and Gender Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Grafting Indigenous Ways of Knowing onto Non-Indigenous Ways of Being: The (Underestimated) Challenges of a Decolonial Imagination

Ahenakew, Cash·2016·International Review of Qualitative Research

Abstract

This article examines issues that arise when Indigenous epistemologies are interpreted through non-Indigenous ontologies in research settings. I use the concept of grafting to refer to the act of transplanting ways of knowing and being from a context where they emerge naturally to a context where they are artificially implanted. I start exploring this context through a poem that outlines the difficulties Indigenous people tend to face when inhabiting academic spaces whose architecture is built on the violent historical foundations of modernity. Next, I briefly outline critiques of recognition and inclusion in political and educational spheres to highlight how liberal discourses have tended to offer only conditional forms of integration that support dominant ways of thinking by presenting them as benevolent and inclusive. I then turn to a discussion of the implications of this analysis for Indigenous research methodologies. I conclude with tentative suggestions for further work in this area.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/irqr.2016.9.3.323

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Aboriginal Education Enhancement Agreement., 2009, Our song spirits are here.
  2. Abram D., 1996, The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world.
  3. 10.1177/117718011401000302 · DOI
  4. 10.1215/9780822395324 · DOI
  5. 10.1215/9780822386988 · DOI
  6. Alfred G. R., 2005, Wasáse: Indigenous pathways of action and freedom.
  7. 10.1080/14767724.2011.605323 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/00131946.2014.924940 · DOI
  9. Andreotti V., 2016, Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives, 5, 79
  10. 10.1177/117718011100700104 · DOI
  11. 10.4324/9780203156155 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/13613324.2012.759920 · DOI
  13. Battiste M., 2002, Indigenous knowledge and pedagogy in First Nations education: A literature review with recommendations.
  14. Battiste M., 2005, Teaching as activism: Equity meets environmentalism, 121, 10.1515/9780773572348-013 · DOI
  15. Battiste M., 2009, Canadian Journal of Native Education, 32, 5
  16. Bhabha H. K., 1994, The location of culture.
  17. 10.17763/haer.79.1.10u6435086352229 · DOI
  18. Buendia E., 2003, Interrogating racism in qualitative research methodology, 49
  19. Cajete G., 2000, Native science: Natural laws of interdependence.
  20. 10.7208/chicago/9780226768830.001.0001 · DOI
  21. Cooper G., 2012, New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 47, 64
  22. 10.5749/minnesota/9780816679645.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Donald D. T., 2009, First Nations Perspectives, 2, 1
  24. Ermine W., 1995, First Nations education in Canada: The circle unfolds, 101
  25. 10.1177/030631299029006006 · DOI
  26. Grosfoguel R., 2012, Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 10, 81
  27. Hiroa T. R., 1974, The coming of the Maori.
  28. Jackson M., 2010, Proceedings of traditional knowledge conference 2008: Te tatau pounamu: The greenstone door, 27
  29. Kovach M., 2009, Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts.
  30. 10.1080/10714410701821297 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Marker M., 2004, Canadian Journal of Native Education, 28, 102
  32. Mika C. T. H. L., 2013, Reclaiming mystery: A Maori philosophy of being, in light of Novalis’ ontology
  33. 10.1080/09620210701667079 · DOI
  34. Penetito W., 2010, What's Maori about Maori education? The struggle for a meaningful context.
  35. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.319 · DOI
  36. 10.1215/9780822383673 · DOI
  37. Royal C., 2009, Te Kaimānga: Towards a new vision for Mātauranga Māori.
  38. Santos B. D. S., 2007, Revista Crítica de Ciências Socials, 80
  39. Smith A., 2009, thought Pocahontas was a movie”: Perspectives on race/culture binaries in education and service professions, 79
  40. Smith L. T., 2012, Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples
  41. Souza L. M., 2012, Postcolonial perspectives on global citizenship education, 68
  42. 10.1177/117718011401000204 · DOI
  43. 10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Tuck E., 2013, Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 29, 72, 10.63997/jct.v29i1.411 · DOI
  45. Wilson S., 2008, Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ahenakew, C.
Corresponding author
Ahenakew, Cash
Venue
International Review of Qualitative Research
Published
2016-11
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
323-340
ISSN
  • 1940-8447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-8455
OpenAlex
W2550138547
Cited by
192
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Review of Qualitative Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Keywords
Indigenous epistemologies, grafting, Indigenous research methodologies, recognition, inclusion, academic space, colonialism, modernity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review