Chinese Medicine and the Anthropology of Menstruation in Contemporary Taiwan
Abstract
Structured interviews with 54 Taiwanese women reveal three frameworks used in interpreting menstruation: biomedicine, traditional Chinese medicine, and popular Buddhist teachings concerning menstrual pollution. Age and class influence women's preferences in ways that only partially reflect traditional‐modern dualisms. Although it does not challenge the prestige of biomedicine, Chinese medicine provides an alternative to Western‐style medicalization of menstruation, while pollution beliefs are positioned within a discourse on social decency, seen as religious piety or symbolic cleanliness. Although most women did not criticize the negative images of female gender embedded in any approach, they interpreted them to serve their convenience and protect their sense of dignity. They represented themselves as making choices as individuals. These findings modify models of Chinese women as simple victims of the culture's symbolic construction of menstruation as polluting, as well as questioning stereotypes of biomedicine as an unproblematic force for their liberation. Chinese medicine emerges as a symbolically multidimensional contributor to Taiwanese Chinese menstrual beliefs and practices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In contemporary culture, the role of blood in the treatment of women is still central, as shown by ethnographic work by Furth and Chen on contemporary beliefs about menstruation in Taiwan.
“In contemporary culture, the role of blood in the treatment of women is still central, as is testifi ed by ethnographic work by Furth and Chen, who have looked into contemporary beliefs on menstruation in Taiwan.”
From Blood, Tigers, Dragons: The Physiology of Transcendence for Women (2008) · cites this paper as Furth and Ch'en Shu-yueh 1992
Cited by
Sorted by citations
<i>Chhaupadi</i> Culture and Reproductive Health of Women in Nepal
Ranabhat, C., Kim, C.-B., Choi, E. H., Aryal, A., Park, M. B., & Doh, Y. A. (2015) · Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/1010539515602743 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Blood, Tigers, Dragons: The Physiology of Transcendence for Women
Valussi, E. (2008) · Asian Medicine · doi:10.1163/157342108x381223 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Furth, C., & Shu‐yueh, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Furth, Charlotte
- Venue
- Medical Anthropology Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-48
- ISSN
- 0745-5194 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1387
- OpenAlex
- W2147942075
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Anthropology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Southern California
- National Institutes of Health
- California State University Long Beach
- National Eye Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Keywords
- menstruation, traditional Chinese medicine, Buddhist doctrine, biomedicine, gender stereotypes, Taiwanese women
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review