The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Problem-Solving Strategies in Music Composition: A Case Study
Open accessAbstract
The composition of a piece of contemporary music for solo piano, 16-piece chamber orchestra, and 6-channel, computer-processed sound was tracked and documented from its initial conception to its concert premier. Notebooks, sketches, diagrams, recorded interviews, and the final score were used to address the solving of three compositional problems raised within the context of the piece. The first problem concerned the need to compose the five themes for the piece (23–100 s in duration) for both solo piano and chamber orchestra. Issues of performance constraints associated with the two media and on translation from a restricted to a more open timbral palette played an important role. The second problem involved composing the two major parts of the piece with similar temporal structures but vastly different ways of traversing the same thematic musical materials. Spatial, graphical representations and self-imposed graphic organization of the score were important factors in resolving this issue. The third problem involved conceiving of the computer component to accompany either of the two major parts, because the piece could be played with them in either order. The solution involved organizing the computer component into discrete parts that had fairly continuous textures and finalizing this component before the final composing of the instrumental components. Issues concerning the aspects of compositional problem-solving that are available for study, the types of representations used in problem solving,and the generalizability of such results to other pieces by the same composer or other composers are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This gives a potential explanation for the descriptions in their first-person account on how it was easier to compose with smaller chunks of AIGC; for P2, editing the recording to be able to curate different ideas was a necessity -likely, as focused on film music, to identify interesting motifs [68].”
From Reflection Across AI-based Music Composition (2024) · cites this paper as [68]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 8 · Cited by 53
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.267 · DOI
- Deliege I., 1987, Music Perception, 4, 325, 10.2307/40285378 · DOI
- 10.1037//0096-1523.21.4.751 · DOI
- McAdams, S. & Reynolds, R. (2002) Problem-solving strategies in the composition of The Angel of Death. In C. Stevens, D. Burnham, G. McPherson, E. Schubert, J. Renwick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Sydney [CD-ROM]. Adelaide: Causal Productions, Sydney.
- Reynolds, R. (2001). The Angel of Death, for piano solo, chamber orchestra and computer processed sound. New York: C. F. Peters. 2. Portions of this work were presented at the 7th International Conference on Music
- Perception and Cognition (McAdams & Reynolds, 2002). The research was funded in part · DOI
- Reynolds, R. (2002a). Compositional strategies in The Angel of Death for piano, chamber orchestra and computer processed sound. In C. Stevens, D. Burnham, G. McPherson, E. Schubert, & J. Renwick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Sydney [CD-ROM]. Adelaide: Causal Productions, Sydney.
- Reynolds, R. (2002b). Form and method: Composing music (the Rothschild essays). New York: Routledge.
- Sloboda, J. A. (1985). The musical mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Metadata
- Authors
- McADAMS, S.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- McADAMS, STEPHEN
- ORCID
- McADAMS, STEPHEN
- Venue
- Music Perception
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 391-429
- ISSN
- 0730-7829 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8312
- OpenAlex
- W1986191841
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 50.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Musicology and Musical Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music Technology and Sound Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
- Keywords
- music composition process, contemporary music, solo piano, chamber orchestra, computer-generated sound, timbre, performance constraints, graphical representation, musical texture, thematic development, compositional techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Problem-Solving Strategies in Music Composition: A Case Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/mp.2004.21.3.391
- The paper
- McADAMS, S. (2004). Problem-Solving Strategies in Music Composition: A Case Study. Music Perception. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2004.21.3.391