What Kind of Mother Am I? Impression Management and the Social Construction of Motherhood
Abstract
Previous research has examined the use of others as props for impression management (e.g., presidents' use of first ladies), but has left many areas underexplored, including the role of nonadults as important associates. This article focuses on the unacknowledged role of children's appearances in the maintenance of identities and management of impressions for their mothers. Using both participant observation of a playgroup and interviews with mothers of young children, the research described here investigates what these mothers think about children's clothing, mothers' concerns about when—and with whom—to manage impressions, and the impressions these women hope they portray through the physical appearance of their children. In addition to providing insight about these phenomena, the article also discusses responses surrounding the importance of first impressions, differences in meanings attached to children's spoiled appearances, and the sacrifices made in motherhood. Results show that women do use well-dressed and groomed children to enact and confirm identities as “good mothers” and to protect and enhance their own self-concepts during the course of everyday social interaction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Western cultural expectations hold that good mothers are selfless and sacrifice their own wants and needs for those of their children.
“Western cultural expectations hold that 'good mothers are selfless and sacrifice their own wants and needs for those of their children' (Collett, 2005, p. 340)”
From Abandoning The Performance Narrative: Two Women's Stories of Transition from Professional Sport (2009) · cites this paper as Collett, 2005
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449 · see citing works
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abandoning The Performance Narrative: Two Women's Stories of Transition from Professional Sport
Douglas, K., & Carless, D. (2009) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200902795109 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
From Advocate to Activist? Mapping the Experiences of Mothers of Children on the Autism Spectrum
Ryan, S., & Cole, K. R. (2009) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00438.x · Cited by 180 · see citing works
- Authors
- Collett, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Collett, Jessica L.
- Venue
- Symbolic Interaction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 327-347
- ISSN
- 0195-6086 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8665
- OpenAlex
- W1984835046
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Symbolic Interaction (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Keywords
- impression management, motherhood, children's clothing, children's appearance, social construction of motherhood, self-concept, first impressions, mothers of young children, play groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review