The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationships with Severely Disabled People: The Social Construction of Humanness
Abstract
This paper presents the perspective of nondisabled people who do not stigmatize, stereotype, and reject those with obvious disabilities. We look at how nondisabled people who are in caring and accepting relationships with severely disabled others define them. Although the disabled people in these relationships sometimes drool, soil themselves, and do not talk or walk—traits that most would consider highly undesirable—they are accepted by the nondisabled people as valued and loved human beings. We look at four dimensions of the nondisabled people's perspective that helps maintain the humanness of the other in their minds: (1) attributing thinking to the other, (2) seeing individuality in the other, (3) viewing the other as reciprocating, and (4) defining social place for the other. The paper illustrates a less deterministic approach to the study of deviance, suggests that people with what are conventionally thought of as extremely negatively valued characteristics can have moral careers that lead to inclusion rather than exclusion, and argues that the study of acceptance needs to be added to the more common focus on rejection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The phenomenology of the social world
Bittner, E., Schutz, A., Walsh, G., & Lehnert, F. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092457 · Cited by 3,588
Cited by
Dehumanization: An integrative review
Haslam, N. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 · Cited by 2,919
Actions Speak Louder than Words: Close Relationships between Humans and Nonhuman Animals
Sanders, C. R. (2003) · Symbolic Interaction · doi:10.1525/si.2003.26.3.405 · Cited by 159
“Say just one word at first”: the emergence of reliable speech in a student labeled with autism
Broderick, A. A., & Kasa-Hendrickson, C. (2001) · Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps · doi:10.2511/rpsd.26.1.13 · Cited by 60
Excusing Tactics: Social Responses to the Public Misbehavior of Companion Animals
Sanders, C. R. (1990) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.2752/089279391787057288 · Cited by 43
Robledo, J., & Donnellan, A. (2016) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs6040023 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. J.
- Venue
- Social Problems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-04
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-148
- ISSN
- 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8533
- OpenAlex
- W1974928750
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 90.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationships with Severely Disabled People: The Social Construction of Humanness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/sp.1989.36.2.03a00030
- The paper
- Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. J. (1989). Relationships with Severely Disabled People: The Social Construction of Humanness. Social Problems. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1989.36.2.03a00030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.