The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crossing Movement Boundaries: Factors that Facilitate Coalition Protest by American College Students, 1930–1990
Abstract
Staging events with a large number of participants is a central means by which collective action movements exercise power. Creating broad coalitions that cut across movement boundaries is one way to mobilize these large numbers. In spite of this fact, most studies of social movement coalitions focus on individual movements, analyzing them in isolation. This article explores the conditions under which organizations form alliances across movement boundaries, and examines whether these cross-movement coalition events are facilitated by the same factors that inspire coalition activity among organizations active within a single movement. I use event history methods to analyze data on 2,644 left-wing protest events that occurred on college campuses between 1930 and 1990. I find several differences between the factors that facilitate cross-movement and within-movement coalition events. The availability of resources is important to within-movement coalition events but not to cross-movement coalition formation. Local threats inspire within-movement coalition events, while larger threats that affect multiple constituencies or broadly defined identities inspire crossmovement coalition formation. The activity of multi-issue movement organizations is associated with higher levels of all forms of protest, including single and cross-movement coalition events. This research contributes to social movement theory by demonstrating that political threats sometimes inspire protest, and that organizational goals influence strategic action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCammon, H., & Campbell, K. (2002) · Mobilization: An International Quarterly · doi:10.17813/maiq.7.3.p61v81l7914865qv · Cited by 181
Cited by
The New Transnational Activism
Tarrow, S. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791055 · Cited by 2,383
The Use of Newspaper Data in the Study of Collective Action
Earl, J., Martin, A., McCarthy, J. D., & Soule, S. A. (2004) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110603 · Cited by 1,074
“Get up, Stand up”: Tactical Repertoires of Social Movements
Taylor, V., & Van dyke, N. (2007) · The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements · doi:10.1002/9780470999103.ch12 · Cited by 428
Self-citationIdentity Politics and Politicized Identities: Identity Processes and the Dynamics of Protest
Klandermans, P. G. (2014) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12167 · Cited by 366
Wang, D. J., & Soule, S. A. (2012) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/664685 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Dyke, N.
- Venue
- Social Problems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 226-250
- ISSN
- 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8533
- OpenAlex
- W2093609313
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crossing Movement Boundaries: Factors that Facilitate Coalition Protest by American College Students, 1930–1990. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/sp.2003.50.2.226
- The paper
- Van Dyke, N. (2003). Crossing Movement Boundaries: Factors that Facilitate Coalition Protest by American College Students, 1930–1990. Social Problems. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2003.50.2.226
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.