Cited by 315RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysRNA Research and Splicing

Collided ribosomes form a unique structural interface to induce Hel2-driven quality control pathways

Open access
Ikeuchi, Ken, Tesina, Petr, Matsuo, Yoshitaka, Sugiyama, Takato, Cheng, Jingdong, Saeki, Yasushi, Tanaka, Keiji, Becker, Thomas +2 more·2019·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

Ribosome stalling triggers quality control pathways targeting the mRNA (NGD: no-go decay) and the nascent polypeptide (RQC: ribosome-associated quality control). RQC requires Hel2-dependent uS10 ubiquitination and the RQT complex in yeast. Here, we report that Hel2-dependent uS10 ubiquitination and Slh1/Rqt2 are crucial for RQC and NGD induction within a di-ribosome (disome) unit, which consists of the leading stalled ribosome and the following colliding ribosome. Hel2 preferentially ubiquitinated a disome over a monosome on a quality control inducing reporter mRNA in an in vitro translation reaction. Cryo-EM analysis of the disome unit revealed a distinct structural arrangement suitable for recognition and modification by Hel2. The absence of the RQT complex or uS10 ubiquitination resulted in the elimination of NGD within the disome unit. Instead, we observed Hel2-mediated cleavages upstream of the disome, governed by initial Not4-mediated monoubiquitination of eS7 and followed by Hel2-mediated K63-linked polyubiquitination. We propose that Hel2-mediated ribosome ubiquitination is required both for canonical NGD (NGD RQC+) and RQC coupled to the disome and that RQC-uncoupled NGD outside the disome (NGD RQC-) can occur in a Not4-dependent manner.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15252/embj.2018100276

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If anabolic signaling drives high rates of translation without sufficient recovery or quality control, resulting translational errors may activate stress responses that impair protein synthesis efficiency.

    “If anabolic signaling drives high rates of translation without sufficient recovery or quality control, the resulting increase in translational errors may activate stress responses that ultimately impair protein synthesis efficiency [208,209,210].”

    From Ribosome Biogenesis as a Putative Bottleneck to Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: Mechanisms, Human Evidence, and Practical Modulators (2026) · cites this paper as [210]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes stalled or collided ribosomes initiating quality-control pathways, supporting the general link between translation problems and a cellular response. It does not say that anabolic signaling or insufficient recovery increases translational errors, or that the response impairs protein-synthesis efficiency. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 315

Authors
Ikeuchi, K., Tesina, P., Matsuo, Y., Sugiyama, T., Cheng, J., Saeki, Y., Tanaka, K., Becker, T., Beckmann, R., & Inada, T.
Affiliations
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (DE)
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Beckmann, Roland
  • Inada, Toshifumi
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2019-01-04
Volume
38
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2908095537
Cited by
315
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 1
FWCI
12.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Takeda Foundation
  • German Research Council (FOR1805, BE1814/15‐1)
  • Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich
  • Graduate School of Quantitative Biosciences Munich
  • MEXT|Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26116003)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
ribosome stalling, ribosome-associated quality control, no-go decay, K63-linked ubiquitination, mRNA quality control
MeSH terms
Ribosomal Proteins, Ribosomes, RNA, Messenger, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Protein Biosynthesis, Cryoelectron Microscopy, RNA Stability, Ubiquitin, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Ubiquitination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review