Shuffled ATG8 interacting motifs form an ancestral bridge between UFMylation and autophagy
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
UFMylation involves the covalent modification of substrate proteins with UFM1 (Ubiquitin‐fold modifier 1) and is important for maintaining ER homeostasis. Stalled translation triggers the UFMylation of ER‐bound ribosomes and activates C53‐mediated autophagy to clear toxic polypeptides. C53 contains noncanonical shuffled ATG8‐interacting motifs (sAIMs) that are essential for ATG8 interaction and autophagy initiation. However, the mechanistic basis of sAIM‐mediated ATG8 interaction remains unknown. Here, we show that C53 and sAIMs are conserved across eukaryotes but secondarily lost in fungi and various algal lineages. Biochemical assays showed that the unicellular alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has a functional UFMylation pathway, refuting the assumption that UFMylation is linked to multicellularity. Comparative structural analyses revealed that both UFM1 and ATG8 bind sAIMs in C53, but in a distinct way. Conversion of sAIMs into canonical AIMs impaired binding of C53 to UFM1, while strengthening ATG8 binding. Increased ATG8 binding led to the autoactivation of the C53 pathway and sensitization of Arabidopsis thaliana to ER stress. Altogether, our findings reveal an ancestral role of sAIMs in UFMylation‐dependent fine‐tuning of C53‐mediated autophagy activation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., von Haeseler, A., & Jermiin, L. S. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4285 · Cited by 18,449 · see citing works
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Proteins were quantified by summing unique and razor peptides and applying intensity-based absolute quantification (iBAQ; Schwanh€ausser et al, 2011).”
Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets
Käll, L., Canterbury, J. D., Weston, J., Noble, W. S., & MacCoss, M. J. (2007) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1113 · Cited by 2,424 · see citing works
Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity
Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka, K., Caceres, E. F., Saw, J. H., Bäckström, D., Juzokaite, L., Vancaester, E., Seitz, K. W., Anantharaman, K., Starnawski, P., Kjeldsen, K. U., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21031 · Cited by 1,226 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AlphaFold2 SLiM screen for LC3-LIR interactions in autophagy
Stuke, J. F. M., & Hummer, G. (2025) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2025.2493999 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Picchianti, L., Sánchez de Medina Hernández, V., Zhan, N., Irwin, N. A., Groh, R., Stephani, M., Hornegger, H., Beveridge, R., Sawa‐Makarska, J., Lendl, T., Grujic, N., Naumann, C., Martens, S., Richards, T. A., Clausen, T., Ramundo, S., Karagöz, G. E., & Dagdas, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Gregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology (AT)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Max Perutz Labs (AT)
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (AT)
- Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Karagöz, G Elif
- Dagdas, Yasin
- ORCID
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 2023-02-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e112053-e112053
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2075
- PMC
- PMC10183829
- OpenAlex
- W4319825963
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 9.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Austrian Science Fund (P 32355, P 34944, SFB F79)
- EC|ERC|HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (101043370)
- EC|Horizon Europe|Excellent Science|HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska‐Curie Actions (101028611)
- UK Research and Innovation (MR/T020970/1)
- Vienna Science and Technology Fund (LS17‐047, LS21‐009)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
- Keywords
- UFMylation, ATG8, UFM1, autophagy initiation, endoplasmic reticulum stress, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, evolutionary conservation, protein-protein interaction, Arabidopsis thaliana
- MeSH terms
- Autophagy-Related Protein 8 Family, Autophagy, Peptides, Proteins, Ribosomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review