The reproducibility “crisis”: Reaction to replication crisis should not stifle innovation
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lack of monitoring and reporting of environmental conditions in cell culture systems is a pervasive but under-recognized problem.
“The lack of monitoring and reporting of environmental conditions in cell culture-systems is a pervasive, but under-recognized problem (Hunter, 2017; Al-Ani et al., 2018; Michl et al., 2019; Klein et al., 2021a; Klein et al., 2021b).”
From Toward Best Practices for Controlling Mammalian Cell Culture Environments (2022) · cites this paper as Hunter, 2017
There is currently an absence of a culture of enhancing standards for environmental control, monitoring, and reporting in biomedical research.
“The task of enhancing standards for environmental control, monitoring, and reporting in biomedical research may initially seem overwhelming provided the current absence of a culture to this end (Collins and Tabak, 2014; Baker, 2016; Hunter, 2017).”
From Toward Best Practices for Controlling Mammalian Cell Culture Environments (2022) · cites this paper as Hunter, 2017
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 4 · Cited by 201
- Authors
- Hunter, P.
- Corresponding author
- Hunter, Philip
- Venue
- The EMBO Reports
- Published
- 2017-08-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1493-1496
- ISSN
- 1469-221X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3178
- PMC
- PMC5579390
- OpenAlex
- W2744947029
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 17.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- EMBO Reports (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Keywords
- replication crisis, reproducibility, research integrity, exploratory research, scientific rigor
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Research Support as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Inventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
