Cited by 32Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsRNA Research and Splicing

Alternative TSSs are co‐regulated in single cells in the mouse brain

Open access
Karlsson, Kasper, Lönnerberg, Peter, Linnarsson, Sten·2017·Molecular Systems Biology

Abstract

Alternative transcription start sites (TSSs) have been extensively studied genome‐wide for many cell types and have been shown to be important during development and to regulate transcript abundance between cell types. Likewise, single‐cell gene expression has been extensively studied for many cell types. However, how single cells use TSSs has not yet been examined. In particular, it is unknown whether alternative TSSs are independently expressed, or whether they are co‐activated or even mutually exclusive in single cells. Here, we use a previously published single‐cell RNA‐seq dataset, comprising thousands of cells, to study alternative TSS usage. We find that alternative TSS usage is a regulated process, and the correlation between two TSSs expressed in single cells of the same cell type is surprisingly high. Our findings indicate that TSSs generally are regulated by common factors rather than being independently regulated or stochastically expressed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15252/msb.20167374

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most alternative promoters might be co-expressed in the same cell.

    “which suggests that most alternative promoters might be co-expressed in the same cell”

    From Alternative promoters in CpG depleted regions are prevalently associated with epigenetic misregulation of liver cancer transcriptomes (2023) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that alternative TSSs were almost always co-expressed in single cells, supporting the general idea. But it distinguishes alternative promoters—TSSs more than 1 kb apart—and says few genes expressed them; the Results (page unavailable) identify only six potential alternative-promoter pairs in the analyzed cells. The paper therefore does not establish that most alternative promoters are co-expressed. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Akan P, Deloukas P (2008) DNA sequence and structural properties as predictors of human and mouse promoters. Gene 410: 165– 176 18234453 PMC2672154
  2. Ayoubi T (2005) Alternative Promoter Usage. In eLS, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd http://www.els.net
  3. Batut P, Dobin A, Plessy C, Carninci P, Gingeras TR (2013) High‐fidelity promoter profiling reveals widespread alternative promoter usage and transposon‐driven developmental gene expression. Genome Res 23: 169– 180 22936248 PMC3530677
  4. Deng Q, Ramskold D, Reinius B, Sandberg R (2014) Single‐cell RNA‐seq reveals dynamic, random monoallelic gene expression in mammalian cells. Science 343: 193– 196 24408435
  5. Forrest AR, Kawaji H, Rehli M, Baillie JK, de Hoon MJ, Haberle V, Lassmann T, Kulakovskiy IV, Lizio M, Itoh M, Andersson R, Mungall CJ, Meehan TF, Schmeier S, Bertin N, Jorgensen M, Dimont E, Arner E, Schmidl C, Schaefer U et al (2014) A promoter‐level mammalian expression atlas. Nature 507: 462– 470 24670764 PMC4529748
  6. Huh C, Nagle JW, Kozak CA, Abrahamson M, Karlsson S (1995) Structural organization, expression and chromosomal mapping of the mouse cystatin‐C‐encoding gene (Cst3). Gene 152: 221– 226 7835704 PMC7173308
  7. Islam S, Kjallquist U, Moliner A, Zajac P, Fan JB, Lonnerberg P, Linnarsson S (2011) Characterization of the single‐cell transcriptional landscape by highly multiplex RNA‐seq. Genome Res 21: 1160– 1167 21543516 PMC3129258
  8. Islam S, Kjallquist U, Moliner A, Zajac P, Fan JB, Lonnerberg P, Linnarsson S (2012) Highly multiplexed and strand‐specific single‐cell RNA 5' end sequencing. Nat Protoc 7: 813– 828 22481528
  9. Karlsson K, Linnarsson S (2017) Single‐cell mRNA isoform diversity in the mouse brain. BMC Genom 18: 126 PMC5291953 28158971
  10. de Klerk E, t Hoen PA (2015) Alternative mRNA transcription, processing, and translation: insights from RNA sequencing. Trends Genet 31: 128– 139 25648499
  11. Leroith D, Roberts CT Jr (1993) Insulin‐like growth factors. Ann N Y Acad Sci 692: 1– 9 8215015
  12. Pelechano V, Wei W, Steinmetz LM (2015) Widespread co‐translational RNA decay reveals ribosome dynamics. Cell 161: 1400– 1412 26046441 PMC4461875
  13. Rach EA, Yuan HY, Majoros WH, Tomancak P, Ohler U (2009) Motif composition, conservation and condition‐specificity of single and alternative transcription start sites in the Drosophila genome. Genome Biol 10: R73 19589141 PMC2728527
  14. Raj A, van Oudenaarden A (2008) Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell 135: 216– 226 18957198 PMC3118044
  15. Rojas‐Duran MF, Gilbert WV (2012) Alternative transcription start site selection leads to large differences in translation activity in yeast. RNA 18: 2299– 2305 23105001 PMC3504680
  16. Shalek AK, Satija R, Adiconis X, Gertner RS, Gaublomme JT, Raychowdhury R, Schwartz S, Yosef N, Malboeuf C, Lu D, Trombetta JJ, Gennert D, Gnirke A, Goren A, Hacohen N, Levin JZ, Park H, Regev A (2013) Single‐cell transcriptomics reveals bimodality in expression and splicing in immune cells. Nature 498: 236– 240 23685454 PMC3683364
  17. Tang DT, Plessy C, Salimullah M, Suzuki AM, Calligaris R, Gustincich S, Carninci P (2013) Suppression of artifacts and barcode bias in high‐throughput transcriptome analyses utilizing template switching. Nucleic Acids Res 41: e44 23180801 PMC3562004
  18. Velten L, Anders S, Pekowska A, Jarvelin AI, Huber W, Pelechano V, Steinmetz LM (2015) Single‐cell polyadenylation site mapping reveals 3′ isoform choice variability. Mol Syst Biol 11: 812 26040288 PMC4501847
  19. Xu Y, Ding Y, Li X, Wu X (2015) Cystatin C is a disease‐associated protein subject to multiple regulation. Immunol Cell Biol 93: 442– 451 25643616 PMC7165929
  20. Zeisel A, Munoz‐Manchado AB, Codeluppi S, Lonnerberg P, La Manno G, Jureus A, Marques S, Munguba H, He L, Betsholtz C, Rolny C, Castelo‐Branco G, Hjerling‐Leffler J, Linnarsson S (2015) Brain structure. Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single‐cell RNA‐seq. Science 347: 1138– 1142 25700174

Authors
Karlsson, K., Lönnerberg, P., & Linnarsson, S.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Linnarsson, Sten
Venue
Molecular Systems Biology
Published
2017-05-01
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
930-930
ISSN
1744-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613027773
Cited by
32
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Systems Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet (STARGET)
  • EC|European Research Council (261063)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
alternative transcription start sites, single-cell gene expression, co-regulation, mouse brain, cell-type-specific transcription, single-cell RNA sequencing
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Brain, Gene Expression, Transcription Initiation Site, Mice, Cystatin C, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review