Optogenetic actuator – ERK biosensor circuits identify MAPK network nodes that shape ERK dynamics
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Combining single‐cell measurements of ERK activity dynamics with perturbations provides insights into the MAPK network topology. We built circuits consisting of an optogenetic actuator to activate MAPK signaling and an ERK biosensor to measure single‐cell ERK dynamics. This allowed us to conduct RNAi screens to investigate the role of 50 MAPK proteins in ERK dynamics. We found that the MAPK network is robust against most node perturbations. We observed that the ERK‐RAF and the ERK‐RSK2‐SOS negative feedback operate simultaneously to regulate ERK dynamics. Bypassing the RSK2‐mediated feedback, either by direct optogenetic activation of RAS, or by RSK2 perturbation, sensitized ERK dynamics to further perturbations. Similarly, targeting this feedback in a human ErbB2‐dependent oncogenic signaling model increased the efficiency of a MEK inhibitor. The RSK2‐mediated feedback is thus important for the ability of the MAPK network to produce consistent ERK outputs, and its perturbation can enhance the efficiency of MAPK inhibitors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Mathematical modeling has provided insights into the network’s structures that decode different signaling inputs into specific ERK dynamics (Santos et al , 2007; Shankaran et al , 2009; Nakakuki et al , 2010; Ryu et al , 2015).”
The Fibroblast Growth Factor signaling pathway
Ornitz, D. M., & Itoh, N. (2015) · WIREs Developmental Biology · doi:10.1002/wdev.176 · Cited by 2,050 · cited 2× · see citing works
“As phospholipase C mediates Ca 2 + signaling in response to FGFR activation (Ornitz & Itoh, 2015), this further validates the role of Ca 2 + signaling in formation of the dip (Appendix Fig S1D –”
Targeting RAS–ERK signalling in cancer: promises and challenges
Samatar, A. A., & Poulikakos, P. I. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4281 · Cited by 1,163 · see citing works
ERBB Receptors: From Oncogene Discovery to Basic Science to Mechanism-Based Cancer Therapeutics
Arteaga, C. L., & Engelman, J. A. (2014) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.025 · Cited by 1,048 · see citing works
Phosphatase‐mediated crosstalk between MAPK signaling pathways in the regulation of cell survival
Junttila, M. R., Li, S., & Westermarck, J. (2008) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.06-7859rev · Cited by 826 · see citing works
Improving FRET dynamic range with bright green and red fluorescent proteins
Lam, A. J., St-Pierre, F., Gong, Y., Marshall, J. D., Cranfill, P. J., Baird, M. A., McKeown, M. R., Wiedenmann, J., Davidson, M. W., Schnitzer, M. J., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2171 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Relaxation oscillations and hierarchy of feedbacks in MAPK signaling
Kochańczyk, M., Kocieniewski, P., Kozłowska, E., Jaruszewicz-Błońska, J., Sparta, B., Pargett, M., Albeck, J. G., Hlavacek, W. S., & Lipniacki, T. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep38244 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Saraf, A., Oberg, E. A., & Strack, S. (2010) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi902160t · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Dessauges, C., Mikelson, J., Dobrzyński, M., Jacques, M., Frismantiene, A., Gagliardi, P. A., Khammash, M., & Pertz, O.
- Affiliations
- University of Bern (CH)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Pertz, Olivier
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular Systems Biology
- Published
- 2022-06-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e10670-e10670
- ISSN
- 1744-4292 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9189677
- OpenAlex
- W4282549436
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 9
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Systems Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- SystemsX.ch (2015/337 (Swiss SystemsX.ch))
- Swiss Cancer Leagues (KLS‐4867‐08‐2019)
- Swiss National Science Foundation (Div3 310030_185376)
- Horizon 2020 and innovation program (730964)
- H2020‐MSCA‐IF (896310‐NOSCAR)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
- Keywords
- optogenetic actuators, RSK2, negative feedback, Ras activation, network robustness, RNAi screen
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Phosphorylation, Biosensing Techniques, Signal Transduction, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Optogenetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review