Cited by 26Seed Germination and PhysiologyGenetic and Environmental Crop StudiesPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies

Effect of Low Temperatures on the Germination of Different Field Pea Genotypes

Sincik, M., Bilgili, U., Uzun, A., Acikgoz, E.·2004·Seed Science and Technology

Abstract

Germination, emergence in sand and seedling development of ten field pea (Pisum sativum L.) accessions differing in leaf type, flower and seed color, cold hardiness and growing habit were assessed at three low temperatures of 2degreesC, 5degreesC and 10degreesC and a control temperature of 20degreesC. Seeds germinated and emerged in temperatures ranging from 5 to 20degreesC. Germination and emergence were highest for all accessions at 10degreesC followed by 20degreesC. Germination and emergence occurred earliest at 20degreesC and were delayed as temperature decreased. The GT(50) and ET50 values (days for 50% germination or emergence) were shortest at 20degreesC and longest at 5degreesC. Cold temperatures, particularly 5degreesC, caused a clear reduction in both top growth and root development and yield and individual seedling weight. Seeds failed to germinate or emerge at 2degreesC when left for 216 days: however seeds of some accessions emerged successfully when transferred to 20degreesC after this period. Germination and emergence were not associated with seed or flower color, cold hardiness and leaf type of the pea accessions at either 20degreesC and or l0degreesC. However, red flowered and cold hardy accessions showed better germination and emergence at 5degreesC and their seeds also remained viable for approximately 8 months at 2degreesC. Cold hardy, purple flowered and small seeded accessions produced smaller seedlings and grew slowly. Seed weight was positively and significantly correlated with top and root development of seedlings, total fresh yield and daily growth rate at all temperatures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15258/sst.2004.32.2.06

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sincik, M., Bilgili, U., Uzun, A., & Acikgoz, E.
Venue
Seed Science and Technology
Published
2004-07-01
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
331-339
ISSN
  • 0251-0952 (ISSN-L)
  • 1819-5717
OpenAlex
W2312674930
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seed Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Seed Germination and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Keywords
field pea, Pisum sativum, seed germination, low temperature, cold tolerance, seedling emergence, seedling development, seed viability, genotypic variation, seed weight, root development, flower color, leaf type

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review