The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Posttraumatic Growth Following the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001: Cognitive, Coping, and Trauma Symptom Predictors in an Internet Convenience Sample
Abstract
Cognitive, coping, and trauma symptom predictors of posttraumatic growth (PTG; measured with the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory) were examined in a large convenience sample (n =1505) participating in a longitudinal Internet-based study following the terrorist attacks of 9/11/01. Results indicate that initial PTG levels (mean 9 weeks post-attacks) were generally associated with higher trauma symptoms (measured with the PTSD Checklist - Specific), positive changes in worldview (measured with the Changes in Outlook Questionnaire), more denial, and less behavioral disengagement (measured with the Brief COPE). Additionally, PTG had a curvilinear association with level of trauma symptoms, such that those reporting symptoms at intermediate levels reported the highest levels of growth. Levels of PTG declined somewhat over time with the exception of Spiritual Change. As expected, PTG levels at follow-up (mean 6.5 months post-attacks) were primarily predicted by initial PTG levels; however, decreases from baseline ...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other studies also found that symptoms of PTSD may result to PTG (Butler et al., 2005; Maercker et al, 2008; Whealin et al., 2020; Liu, 2017; Barton et al., 2013).”
From Traumatic Events, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and Post-Traumatic Growth among University Students in Kabul City (2025) · cites this paper as Butler et al., 2005
Citations
Cites
The posttraumatic growth inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.2490090305 · Cited by 7,061
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ayubi, B., Sediqi, K. Z., & Mirzaee, M. J. (2025) · Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities · doi:10.62810/jssh.v2i3.114
Metadata
- Authors
- Butler, L. D., Blasey, C. M., Garlan, R. W., McCaslin, S. E., Azarow, J., Chen, X.-H., Desjardins, J. C., DiMiceli, S., Seagraves, D. A., Hastings, T. A., Kraemer, H. C., & Spiegel, D.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Venue
- Traumatology
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 247-267
- ISSN
- 1085-9373 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-7656
- OpenAlex
- W2064950475
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Traumatology An International Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Stanford Center on Stress and Health
- Institute for Research on Unlimited Love
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- posttraumatic growth, September 11 attacks, trauma symptoms, coping, cognitive factors, worldview change, spiritual transformation, denial, behavioral disengagement, post-traumatic stress disorder, longitudinal change, predictors of growth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review