The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interrelationships between Leaf Amount, Light Distribution and Total Photosynthesis in a Plant Community
Open accessAbstract
1. In order to find a practical means of estimation of the production of matter in a plant community and to give a logical explanation to the variability of directly measured values, theoretical analyses have been advanced of the interrelationshipsbetween leaf amount, light distribution and total foliage photosynthesis2. Inside foliage relative light intensity received by the leaves is not always the same as the light intensity measured at horizontal plane at the same height (Fig. 1). In homogeneous stands the former can be derived from Equation (3), when leaf transmissibility is known and extinction coefficient (K in Equation (2)) is obtained beforehand by 'stratifying clip method'.3. If photosynthetic capacity in the active leaf and mean respiration rate of all the leaves in a stand are known, the mean total daily photosynthesis of whole foliage is estimated by Equation (5). An example in representative herbaceous species is presented in Fig. 5, where it is clearly indicated that with lower 'leaf area index' daily production in foliage is indifferent to inclination of leaves, while with increase of leaf amount the role of inclination in the production becomes very remarkable, upright leaves being more efficient than horizontal ones under full daylight as demonstrated by Watson and Witts.4. Compensation light intensity and 'optimum leaf-area index' (Fopt-leaf amount February 1960 SAEKI, T. 63 in the form of LAI for the highest production) are calculated from the photosynthetic capacity in the active leaf and respiration rate of the lower leaf (Equations (6) and (7)). The obtained values seem to be quite reasonable in consideration of the minimum light intensities and 'leaf area indexes' in the natural communities.5. The highest daily production in a plant community, Pmax, calculated with Equation (8) was discussed in relation to the extinction coefficient and incoming radiation (Figs. 7 and 8). An approximate coincidence was recognized between the calculated values and the highest net production in crop fields collated by Blackman and Black.The author should like to express his sincere thanks to Prof. M. Monsi for his
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Competition Among Crop and Pasture Plants
Donald, C. M. (1963) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60397-1 · Cited by 708
Development of the Monsi-Saeki Theory on Canopy Structure and Function
HIROSE, T. (2004) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mci047 · Cited by 286
The physiological response of winter wheat to reductions in plant density
WHALEY, J. M., SPARKES, D. L., FOULKES, M. J., SPINK, J. H., SEMERE, T., & SCOTT, R. K. (2000) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2000.tb00048.x · Cited by 184
Weih, M., & Nordh, N.-E. (2005) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/25.9.1197 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- SAEKI, T.
- Venue
- Shokubutsugaku Zasshi
- Publisher
- The Botanical Society of Japan
- Published
- 1960
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 860
- Pages
- 55-63
- ISSN
- 0006-808X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008936323
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interrelationships between Leaf Amount, Light Distribution and Total Photosynthesis in a Plant Community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15281/jplantres1887.73.55
- The paper
- SAEKI, T. (1960). Interrelationships between Leaf Amount, Light Distribution and Total Photosynthesis in a Plant Community. Shokubutsugaku Zasshi. https://doi.org/10.15281/jplantres1887.73.55
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.