The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The cost-effectiveness of treatment for alcoholism: a second approximation.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This review builds on the innovative research synthesis of Holder and his colleagues, addresses some of the limitations of the box-score approach to assessing treatment effectiveness that they used and provides a second approximation of the cost-effectiveness of treatment for alcoholism. METHOD: For each of 141 comparative treatment studies, we determined whether or not it found at least one statistically significant positive effect on a drinking-related outcome variable for each of the modalities examined in a paired contrast with one other condition. We next calculated the predicted probability of each study yielding at least one statistically significant treatment effect, based on the number of tests for treatment effects conducted. Following that, for each study of a particular treatment modality, the strength of the "weakest competitor" against which the modality had been compared was determined. For each modality, we used the average predicted probability of the relevant studies finding a significant effect and the average effectiveness of the weakest competitor to predict the modality's effectiveness. RESULTS: We calculated an Adjusted Effectiveness Index (AEIn) for each modality, which was the difference between its predicted and actual effectiveness score. Our AEIn results were consistent with those of Holder et al. in suggesting that some of the same modalities appear to be effective or ineffective. Our results differed from their findings with respect to other modalities, however. Using data presented by Holder and his colleagues on the minimum estimated cost of providing different modalities, we offer a second approximation of the modalities' cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found a smaller range of effectiveness across modalities than did Holder and his colleagues and a nonsignificant relationship between cost and effectiveness. Like Holder et al., we do not believe major treatment provision or funding decisions should be based solely on this type of review.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Family treatments for substance use disorders have low uptake in service systems, due to financing barriers for interventions that focus on people other than the identified patient [56] and the limited economic evaluations of such treatments [57].”
From Translating economic evaluations into financing strategies for implementing evidence-based practices (2021) · cites this paper as [57]
In the citing paper
“Family treatments for substance use disorders have low uptake in service systems, due to financing barriers for interventions that focus on people other than the identified patient [56] and the limited economic evaluations of such treatments [57].”
From Translating economic evaluations into financing strategies for implementing evidence-based practices (2021) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cites
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a review
BIEN, T. H., MILLER, W. R., & TONIGAN, J. S. (1993) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb00820.x · Cited by 1,577
The cost effectiveness of treatment for alcoholism: a first approximation
Holder, H., Longabaugh, R., Miller, W. R., & Rubonis, A. V. (1991) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1991.52.517 · Cited by 394
Secondary prevention with college drinkers: Evaluation of an alcohol skills training program.
Kivlahan, D. R., Marlatt, G. A., Fromme, K., Coppel, D. B., & al, E. (1990) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.58.6.805 · Cited by 335
Comparative outcome studies of psychotherapy: methodological issues and strategies.
Kazdin, A. (1986) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.54.1.95 · Cited by 258
The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives.
Reichardt, C. S., & Rallis, S. F. (1994) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 234
Kuchipudi, V, Hobein, K., Flickinger, A., & Iber, F. L. (1990) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1990.51.356 · Cited by 94
Acupuncture treatment for drug abuse: A technical review
McLellan, A. T., Grossman, D. S., BLAINE, J. D., & Haverkos, H. W. (1993) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/0740-5472(93)90061-6 · Cited by 81
Keso, L., & Salaspuro, M. P. (1990) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.1990.tb01206.x · Cited by 73
The process of treatment selection among previously untreated help-seeking problem drinkers
Timko, C., Finney, J. W., Moos, R. H., Moos, B. S., & Steinbaum, D. P. (1993) · Journal of Substance Abuse · doi:10.1016/0899-3289(93)90064-i · Cited by 71
Self-citationHODGSON, R. J. (1994) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb03754.x · Cited by 42
Howard, M. O. (1993) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1993.54.667 · Cited by 16
Skinner, H. A. (1981) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.138.4.312 · Cited by 16
A Discrete Choice Model of Alcoholism Treatment Location
Goodman, A. C., Holder, H. D., Nishiura, E., & Hankin, J. R. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199212000-00003 · Cited by 11
Program quality and program effectiveness:
Posavac, E. J. (1995) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(94)00041-u · Cited by 3
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anton, R. F., O’Malley, S. S., Ciraulo, D. A., Cisler, R. A., Couper, D., Donovan, D. M., Gastfriend, D. R., Hosking, J. D., Johnson, B. A., LoCastro, J. S., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.17.2003 · Cited by 1,930
Room, R., Babor, T., & Rehm, J. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)17870-2 · Cited by 1,625
Mesa Grande: a methodological analysis of clinical trials of treatments for alcohol use disorders
Miller, W. R., & Wilbourne, P. L. (2002) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00019.x · Cited by 805
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Substance Use Disorders
McHugh, R. K., Hearon, B. A., & Otto, M. W. (2010) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2010.04.012 · Cited by 626
Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for alcohol and substance use disorders
Witkiewitz, K., Marlatt, G. A., & Walker, D. (2005) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/jcop.2005.19.3.211 · Cited by 514
Metadata
- Authors
- Finney, J. W., & Monahan, S. C.
- Affiliations
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol
- Publisher
- Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-243
- ISSN
- 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
- 1934-2683
- OpenAlex
- W2036704426
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA008689, AA08689)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Keywords
- alcoholism treatment, cost-effectiveness, treatment effectiveness, multiple comparisons, treatment costs
- MeSH terms
- Alcoholism, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Random Allocation, Health Care Costs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review