Individual differences in alcohol responsivity: Physiological, psychomotor and subjective response domains
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Psychometrically stable measures of individual differences in response to consuming alcohol were developed as part of an ongoing project investigating "high-tolerant" drinking drivers. The derived measures were correlated with diagnostic criteria of alcohol abuse and dependence, as well as drinking frequency, heavy drinking and tolerance estimations. METHOD: Male subjects (N = 94), 21 to 59 years old, participated in each of two identical alcohol consumption sessions (mean dose = 0.78 g/kg). Multiple response measures obtained before and after drinking (mean BAC = 78 mg/dl, descending) were used to compute postconsumption regression residuals that were factor analyzed. RESULTS: Factors reflecting psychomotor, subjective and physiological responsivity to alcohol were extracted. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated consistent psychomotor and physiological factor structures across the two testing sessions, but a bifurcation of the subjective measures. Test-retest correlations of the responsivity residuals indicated medium to moderately large effect sizes (mean = .32, range = .15-.51). Residuals summated within each response domain indicate moderate internal consistency (mean = .56, range = .45-.72) and higher reliabilities than single measure indices (range = .53-.59). Summated residuals within the response domains suggest diminished responsivity is associated with more severe alcohol-use diagnoses and were differentially predictive of self-reported drinking practices. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol responsivity is multidimensional. Individual differences across different domains can be measured reliably and are associated with different patterns of alcohol use and abuse. Greater attention should be given to the specific domain of alcohol responsivity measures obtained in past and future research that relates individual differences to alcohol-related problems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The few published test-retest studies of alcohol responses have included only brief between-session intervals with a focus on measurement reliability.
“The few published test-retest studies of alcohol responses have included only brief between-session intervals with a focus on measurement reliability(30, 31).”
From A Prospective 5-Year Re-examination of Alcohol Response in Heavy Drinkers Progressing in Alcohol Use Disorder (2016) · cites this paper as [30]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Mundt, J. C., Perrine, M. W., & Searles, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Vermont Alcohol Research Center, Colchester 05446, USA.
- Venue
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol
- Publisher
- Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 130-140
- ISSN
- 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
- 1934-2683
- OpenAlex
- W2084841850
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5p01aa007203-05)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (P01-AA07203)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Keywords
- alcohol tolerance, alcohol abuse and dependence, heavy drinking, drinking frequency, alcohol consumption, test-retest reliability, alcohol-related problems
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Arousal, Automobile Driving, Awareness, Drug Tolerance, Postural Balance, Humans, Individuality, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Set, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review