Cited by 24Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesTraffic and Road SafetyAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Individual differences in alcohol responsivity: Physiological, psychomotor and subjective response domains

Mundt, J C, Perrine, M W, Searles, J S·1997·Journal of Studies on Alcohol

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Psychometrically stable measures of individual differences in response to consuming alcohol were developed as part of an ongoing project investigating "high-tolerant" drinking drivers. The derived measures were correlated with diagnostic criteria of alcohol abuse and dependence, as well as drinking frequency, heavy drinking and tolerance estimations. METHOD: Male subjects (N = 94), 21 to 59 years old, participated in each of two identical alcohol consumption sessions (mean dose = 0.78 g/kg). Multiple response measures obtained before and after drinking (mean BAC = 78 mg/dl, descending) were used to compute postconsumption regression residuals that were factor analyzed. RESULTS: Factors reflecting psychomotor, subjective and physiological responsivity to alcohol were extracted. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated consistent psychomotor and physiological factor structures across the two testing sessions, but a bifurcation of the subjective measures. Test-retest correlations of the responsivity residuals indicated medium to moderately large effect sizes (mean = .32, range = .15-.51). Residuals summated within each response domain indicate moderate internal consistency (mean = .56, range = .45-.72) and higher reliabilities than single measure indices (range = .53-.59). Summated residuals within the response domains suggest diminished responsivity is associated with more severe alcohol-use diagnoses and were differentially predictive of self-reported drinking practices. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol responsivity is multidimensional. Individual differences across different domains can be measured reliably and are associated with different patterns of alcohol use and abuse. Greater attention should be given to the specific domain of alcohol responsivity measures obtained in past and future research that relates individual differences to alcohol-related problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsa.1997.58.130

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 24

Authors
Mundt, J. C., Perrine, M. W., & Searles, J. S.
Affiliations
Vermont Alcohol Research Center, Colchester 05446, USA.
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol
Published
1997-03
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
130-140
ISSN
  • 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-2683
OpenAlex
W2084841850
Cited by
24
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01aa007203-05)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (P01-AA07203)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
alcohol tolerance, alcohol abuse and dependence, heavy drinking, drinking frequency, alcohol consumption, test-retest reliability, alcohol-related problems
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Arousal, Automobile Driving, Awareness, Drug Tolerance, Postural Balance, Humans, Individuality, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Set, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review