The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Multisite Randomized Trial of Social Norms Marketing Campaigns to Reduce College Student Drinking
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: An 18-site randomized trial was conducted to determine the effectiveness of social norms marketing (SNM) campaigns in reducing college student drinking. The SNM campaigns are intended to correct misperceptions of subjective drinking norms and thereby drive down alcohol consumption. METHOD: Institutions of higher education were randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. At the treatment group institutions, SNM campaigns delivered school-specific, data-driven messages through a mix of campus media venues. Cross-sectional student surveys were conducted by mail at baseline (n = 2,771) and at posttest 3 years later (n = 2,939). Hierarchical linear modeling was applied to examine multiple drinking outcomes, taking intraclass correlation into account. RESULTS: Controlling for other predictors, having an SNM campaign was significantly associated with lower perceptions of student drinking levels and lower alcohol consumption, as measured by a composite drinking scale, recent maximum consumption, blood alcohol concentration for recent maximum consumption, drinks consumed when partying, and drinks consumed per week. A moderate mediating effect of normative perceptions on student drinking was demonstrated by an attenuation of the Experimental Group x Time interaction, ranging from 16.4% to 39.5% across measures. Additional models that took into account the intensity of SNM campaign activity at the treatment institutions suggested that there was a dose-response relationship. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the most rigorous evaluation of SNM campaigns conducted to date. Analysis revealed that students attending institutions that implemented an SNM campaign had a lower relative risk of alcohol consumption than students attending control group institutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems.
Walton, G. M., & Wilson, T. D. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000115 · Cited by 617
Changing Norms to Change Behavior
Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (2016) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015013 · Cited by 527
Predictors of alcohol use during the first year of college: Implications for prevention
Borsari, B., Murphy, J. G., & Barnett, N. P. (2007) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.01.017 · Cited by 422
A Re-Explication of Social Norms, Ten Years Later
Rimal, R. N., & Lapinski, M. K. (2015) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/comt.12080 · Cited by 403
Prevention and early intervention to improve mental health in higher education students: A review
Reavley, N., & Jorm, A. F. (2010) · Early Intervention in Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7893.2010.00167.x · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- DeJONG, W., SCHNEIDER, S. K., TOWVIM, L. G., MURPHY, M. J., DOERR, E. E., SIMONSEN, N. R., MASON, K. E., & SCRIBNER, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol
- Publisher
- Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 868-879
- ISSN
- 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
- 1934-2683
- OpenAlex
- W2131089619
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Multisite Randomized Trial of Social Norms Marketing Campaigns to Reduce College Student Drinking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.868
- The paper
- DeJONG, W., SCHNEIDER, S. K., TOWVIM, L. G., MURPHY, M. J., DOERR, E. E., SIMONSEN, N. R., MASON, K. E., & SCRIBNER, R. A. (2006). A Multisite Randomized Trial of Social Norms Marketing Campaigns to Reduce College Student Drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.868
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.