The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Persistence of Heavy Drinking and Ensuing Consequences at Heavy Drinking Colleges
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine drinking levels, related harms, and secondhand effects of alcohol use at heavy drinking colleges between 1993 and 2005 at colleges with high levels of drinking in 1993. METHOD: Students attending 18 colleges with high levels of heavy episodic drinking (50% of students or more) from the 1993 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study were surveyed in 2005 (n = 4,518). Data collected through mailed and Web-based questionnaires were compared with responses from students at the same schools in 1993, 1997, 1999, and 2001 (N = 13,254) using time trend analyses. RESULTS: Overall, levels of alcohol consumption, experience of problems, and levels of secondhand effects remained high among students attending heavy drinking colleges. More than four of five students at these schools drank alcohol (range: 85%-88%), and more than half engaged in heavy episodic drinking (range: 53%-58%). The stability of drinking behavior occurred among subgroups of students as well. The few statistically significant changes occurred mainly between 1993 and 1997. A decline in driving after any drinking between 1997 and 2005 was observed, but no similar decline was found in two other measures of drinking and driving. CONCLUSIONS: Heavy drinking and associated problems continue unabated, with few exceptions, at colleges that are most in need of intervention: those with high levels of heavy episodic drinking. Addressing student alcohol use at heavy drinking colleges may require stronger, more consistent, and more comprehensive approaches, with increased emphasis on the alcohol environment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Among groups with highest episodic drinking, fraternity/sorority members had consistently high levels of heavy episodic drinking over time, with 75% of members (both) versus 51% nonmembers and 85% fraternity/sorority house residents versus 72% nonresidents classified as heavy episodic drinkers across the surveys.”
From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Nelson et al. (2009)
In the citing paper
“The researchers found no significant changes in the groups over time.”
From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Nelson et al. (2009)
In the citing paper
“Among groups with highest episodic drinking, fraternity/sorority members had consistently high levels of heavy episodic drinking over time, with 75% of members (both) versus 51% nonmembers and 85% fraternity/sorority house residents versus 72% nonresidents classified as heavy episodic drinkers across the surveys.”
From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Nelson et al. (2009)
In the citing paper
“The researchers found no significant changes in the groups over time when comparing findings to responses (n = 13,254) from same institutions in 1993, 1993, 1999, and 2001.”
From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Nelson et al. (2009)
In the citing paper
“Nelson et al. (2009) found 85% of fraternity/sorority house residents versus 72% nonresidents were classified as heavy episodic drinkers among students attending 18 colleges with high levels of episodic drinking (50% or more students identified from the 1993 Harvard CAS Study) in 2005 (n = 4,518).”
From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Nelson et al. (2009)
In the citing paper
“Comparing results among all iterations of CAS with their new sample, researchers found an average of 85% of fraternity/sorority house residents versus 72% nonresidents were classified as heavy episodic drinkers across the surveys.”
From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Nelson et al. (2009)
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hingson, R. W., Zha, W., & Weitzman, E. R. (2009) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Supplement · doi:10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.12 · Cited by 1,184
Self-citationHagger, M. S., Lonsdale, A. J., Koka, A., Hein, V., Pasi, H., Lintunen, T., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2011) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-011-9163-8 · Cited by 181
I drink therefore I am: Validating alcohol-related implicit association tests.
Lindgren, K. P., Neighbors, C., Teachman, B. A., Wiers, R. W. H. J., Westgate, E. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (2012) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/a0027640 · Cited by 165
The Theory of Planned Behavior as a Predictor of Growth in Risky College Drinking
Collins, S. E., Witkiewitz, K. A., & Larimer, M. E. (2011) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2011.72.322 · Cited by 179
Global sleep quality as a moderator of alcohol consumption and consequences in college students
Kenney, S. R., LaBrie, J. W., Hummer, J. F., & Pham, A. T. (2012) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.01.006 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, T. F., Xuan, Z., Lee, H., Weitzman, E. R., & Wechsler, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
- Publisher
- Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 726-734
- ISSN
- 1937-1888 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-4114
- OpenAlex
- W1972725770
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Lifestyle Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Keywords
- binge drinking, university students, student alcohol use, drinking and driving, alcohol environment, alcohol interventions
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Alcoholic Intoxication, Automobile Driving, Female, Humans, Male, Sexual Behavior, Social Behavior, Students, Universities, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
