Cited by 36Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMedia Influence and HealthAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Investigating Associations Between Perceived Parental Alcohol-Related Messages and College Student Drinking

Open access
Abar, Caitlin C., Morgan, Nicole R., Small, Meg L., Maggs, Jennifer L.·2012·Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

Abstract

Objective A debate remains regarding whether parents should teach their children harm-reduction tips for using alcohol while in college or whether they should maintain a zero-tolerance policy. Which type of alcohol-related communication parents should endorse is not empirically clear. The current study made use of a longitudinal measurement-burst design to examine this issue. Method The sample consisted of 585 second-year students from a large university in the northeastern United States. Participants completed a baseline survey and 14 daily web-based surveys. Students were assessed for perceptions of parental alcohol-related messages and their own alcohol use. Multilevel models were estimated using HLM 6.04. Results The data indicate that zero-tolerance messages appeared most protective against alcohol use and consequences. Harm-reduction messages were most risky, even when compared with mixed messages or the absence of a message. Conclusions Findings indicate that a zero-tolerance approach was associated with safer outcomes than other messages, even if students were already using alcohol.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.71

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings from cross-sectional studies from the 2010s suggest that phone calls and texting were far more prevalent than other forms of communication among parents and college students.

    “Findings from cross-sectional studies from the 2010s suggest that phone calls and texting were far more prevalent than other forms of communication among parents and college students (Abar et al., 2012;Sax & Weintraub, 2014;Stein et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abar, C. C., Morgan, N. R., Small, M. L., & Maggs, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Published
2012-01
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
71-79
ISSN
  • 1937-1888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-4114
OpenAlex
W2075977828
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA016016, F31AA018063)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
college drinking, zero tolerance policy, harm reduction, parental communication
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Perception, Persuasive Communication, Students, Universities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review