Investigating Associations Between Perceived Parental Alcohol-Related Messages and College Student Drinking
Open accessAbstract
Objective A debate remains regarding whether parents should teach their children harm-reduction tips for using alcohol while in college or whether they should maintain a zero-tolerance policy. Which type of alcohol-related communication parents should endorse is not empirically clear. The current study made use of a longitudinal measurement-burst design to examine this issue. Method The sample consisted of 585 second-year students from a large university in the northeastern United States. Participants completed a baseline survey and 14 daily web-based surveys. Students were assessed for perceptions of parental alcohol-related messages and their own alcohol use. Multilevel models were estimated using HLM 6.04. Results The data indicate that zero-tolerance messages appeared most protective against alcohol use and consequences. Harm-reduction messages were most risky, even when compared with mixed messages or the absence of a message. Conclusions Findings indicate that a zero-tolerance approach was associated with safer outcomes than other messages, even if students were already using alcohol.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Findings from cross-sectional studies from the 2010s suggest that phone calls and texting were far more prevalent than other forms of communication among parents and college students.
“Findings from cross-sectional studies from the 2010s suggest that phone calls and texting were far more prevalent than other forms of communication among parents and college students (Abar et al., 2012;Sax & Weintraub, 2014;Stein et al., 2016).”
From Daily Communication Between First-Year College Students and Their Parents: Associations With Perceived Relationship Positivity (2024) · cites this paper as Abar et al., 2012
Cites
Harm reduction approaches to alcohol use
Marlatt, G. A., & Witkiewitz, K. (2002) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/s0306-4603(02)00294-0 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Duckworth, J. C., Bumpus, M., Forsythe, K. M., Cooper, B. R., & Hill, L. G. (2024) · Emerging Adulthood · doi:10.1177/21676968241273308 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Abar, C. C., Morgan, N. R., Small, M. L., & Maggs, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
- Publisher
- Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-79
- ISSN
- 1937-1888 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-4114
- PMC
- PMC3237713
- OpenAlex
- W2075977828
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA016016, F31AA018063)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Keywords
- college drinking, zero tolerance policy, harm reduction, parental communication
- MeSH terms
- Alcohol Drinking, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Perception, Persuasive Communication, Students, Universities, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review