The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention in a College Student Health Center: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This study tested the effectiveness of brief primary care provider interventions delivered in a college student health center to a sample of college students who screened positive for high-risk drinking. METHOD: Between November 2005 and August 2006, 8,753 students who presented as new patients to the health service at a large public university were screened for high-risk drinking, and 2,484 students (28%) screened positive on the 5/4 gender-specific high-risk drinking question (i.e., five or more drinks per occasion for men and four or more for women). Students who screened positive for high-risk drinking and consented to participate (N= 363; 52% female) were randomly assigned either to a control group (n = 182) or to an experimental group (n = 181). Participants in the experimental group received two brief intervention sessions that were founded in motivational interviewing techniques and delivered by four specially trained providers within the student health center. Data on alcohol use and related harms were obtained from a Web-based Healthy Lifestyle Questionnaire, 30-day Timeline Followback alcohol-use diaries, the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index (RAPI), and eight items from the Drinker Inventory of Consequences-2L. RESULTS: Repeated measures analysis showed that, compared with the control group (C), the intervention group (I) had significant reductions in typical estimated blood alcohol concentration (BAC) (C = .071 vs I = .057 at 3 months; C = .073 vs I = .057 at 6 months), peak BAC (C = . 142 vs I = .112 at 3 months; C = .145 vs I = .108 at 6 months), peak number of drinks per sitting (C = 8.03 vs I = 6.87 at 3 months; C = 7.98 vs I = 6.52 at 6 months), average number of drinks per week (C = 9.47 vs I = 7.33 at 3 months; C = 8.90 vs I = 6.16 at 6 months), number of drunk episodes in a typical week (C = 1.24 vs I = 0.85 at 3 months; C = 1.10 vs I = 0.71 at 6 months), number of times taken foolish risks (C = 2.24 vs I = 1.12 at 3 months), and RAPI sum scores (C = 6.55 vs I = 4.96 at 6 months; C = 6.17 vs I = 4.58 at 9 months). CONCLUSIONS: Brief interventions delivered by primary care providers in a student health center to high-risk-drinking students may result in significantly decreased alcohol consumption, high-risk drinking, and alcohol-related harms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Three trials in the primary meta-analysis (1638 participants) recruited only adolescents or young adults (defined as maximum 21 years, 24 years and 25 years in Bernstein 2010; Fleming 2010; Schaus 2009, respectively).”
From Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations (2018) · cites this paper as Schaus 2009
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Two studies took place in college health clinics (Fleming 2010; Schaus 2009)”
From Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations (2018) · cites this paper as Schaus 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Missing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638
Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002) · Cited by 7,002
Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (2011) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119513469 · Cited by 4,639
Health and Behavioral Consequences of Binge Drinking in College
Wechsler, H. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.272.21.1672 · Cited by 1,813
Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking
White, H. R., & Labouvie, E. W. (1989) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1989.50.30 · Cited by 1,693
Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations
Kaner, E. F., Beyer, F. R., Muirhead, C., Campbell, F., Pienaar, E. D., Bertholet, N., Daeppen, J. B., Saunders, J. B., & Burnand, B. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004148.pub4 · Cited by 1,665
Wechsler, H., Lee, J. E., Kuo, M., Seibring, M., Nelson, T. F., & Lee, H. (2002) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448480209595713 · Cited by 1,457
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-2265 · Cited by 1,385
American College Health Association
(1979) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/01644300.1979.10392892 · Cited by 1,154
Hingson, R., Heeren, T., Winter, M., & Wechsler, H. (2005) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144652 · Cited by 1,102
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations
Kaner, E. F., Beyer, F. R., Muirhead, C., Campbell, F., Pienaar, E. D., Bertholet, N., Daeppen, J. B., Saunders, J. B., & Burnand, B. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004148.pub4 · Cited by 1,665
White, A. M. (2013) · Alcohol research · doi:10.35946/arcr.v35.2.11 · Cited by 820
Brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Lipsey, M. W. (2015) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2014.09.001 · Cited by 468
Motivational interviewing for substance abuse.
Smedslund, G., Berg, R., Hammerstrøm, K., Steiro, A., Leiknes, K., Dahl, H., & Karlsen, K. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008063.pub2 · Cited by 490
Moyer, V. A. (2013) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00652 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaus, J. F., Sole, M. L., McCoy, T. P., Mullett, N., & O'Brien, M. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Supplement
- Publisher
- Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.
- Published
- 2009-07
- Issue
- s16
- Pages
- 131-142
- ISSN
- 1946-584X (ISSN-L)
- 1946-5858
- PMC
- PMC2701092
- OpenAlex
- W2105203367
- Semantic Scholar
- cf10cde7cd692c4f03be767ccf2c380fd3e8c6b9
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs Supplement (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5u18aa015673-02)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01AA014741, U18 AA015673, U01-AA14741, 1 U18 AA015673-01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- brief intervention, alcohol screening, university students, hazardous drinking, motivational interviewing, student health center, alcohol-related harm, blood alcohol concentration, binge drinking, alcohol-related consequences
- MeSH terms
- Alcohol Drinking, Counseling, Humans, Mass Screening, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Student Health Services, Students, Universities, Treatment Outcome, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review