Cited by 237Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsHomelessness and Social Issues

Quality of life as an outcome measure in alcoholism treatment research.

Donovan, Dennis, Mattson, Margaret E, Cisler, Ron A, Longabaugh, Richard, Zweben, Allen·2005·Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present article reviews the literature to date dealing with quality of life (QoL) as it relates to drinking behavior, alcohol use disorders and treatment outcome. METHOD: Articles using the term "quality of life" to describe a status or outcome construct for individuals diagnosed with or being treated for alcohol use disorders or that used one or more instruments considered to reflect patients' QoL were identified primarily through Psychological Abstracts, MEDLINE and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism's ETOH archival database. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies, published between 1993 and 2004, met these criteria. Twelve different QoL measures were used. Frequent heavy drinking or episodic heavy drinking (e.g., five or more drinks per occasion) patterns were associated with reduced QoL. Alcoholics had lower levels of QoL compared with general population norms or with other chronic health conditions. This relationship appears to be moderated by a number of sociodemographic and client characteristics, such as age, education, gender and co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Alcohol-dependent individuals experience improvements in QoL across treatment and with both short-term and long-term abstinence. Despite these improvements, many alcoholic individuals' QoL is unlikely to equal or exceed that of normative groups. Also, among hazardous and harmful drinkers, achieving and maintaining a marked reduction in drinking, even without complete abstinence, is associated with significant increases in QoL. CONCLUSIONS: QoL represents an important area to consider in assessing individuals with alcohol use disorders and in evaluating alcoholism treatment outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.119

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 237

Authors
Donovan, D., Mattson, M. E., Cisler, R. A., Longabaugh, R., & Zweben, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement
Published
2005-07
Issue
s15
Pages
119-139
ISSN
  • 0363-468X (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6005
OpenAlex
W2007900545
Cited by
237
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol Supplement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U10AA011799, U10AA11799, U10AA11777, U10AA011773, U10 AA 11773, U10AA011777)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
quality of life, alcoholism, alcoholism treatment, treatment outcome measures, heavy drinking, episodic heavy drinking, abstinence, hazardous drinking, co-occurring psychiatric disorders, sociodemographic moderators
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Behavior Therapy, Clinical Trials as Topic, Combined Modality Therapy, Drug Therapy, Humans, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review