The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Models of the Structure and Voltage-Gating Mechanism of the Shaker K+ Channel
Open accessAbstract
In the preceding, accompanying article, we present models of the structure and voltage-dependent gating mechanism of the KvAP bacterial K+ channel that are based on three types of evidence: crystal structures of portions of the KvAP protein, theoretical modeling criteria for membrane proteins, and biophysical studies of the properties of native and mutated voltage-gated channels. Most of the latter experiments were performed on the Shaker K+ channel. Some of these data are difficult to relate directly to models of the KvAP channel's structure due to differences in the Shaker and KvAP sequences. We have dealt with this problem by developing new models of the structure and gating mechanism of the transmembrane and extracellular portions of the Shaker channel. These models are consistent with almost all of the biophysical data. In contrast, much of the experimental data are incompatible with the "paddle" model of gating that was proposed when the KvAP crystal structures were first published. The general folding pattern and gating mechanisms of our current models are similar to some of our earlier models of the Shaker channel.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cch1 is not voltage-gated, supported by previous findings that Cch1 in C. neoformans lacks the conserved voltage sensor motif.
“Our results indicate that Cch1 is not voltage-gated, and this is further supported by our previous findings demonstrating that the protein sequence of Cch1 in C. neoformans lacks the highly conserved voltage sensor motif, the hallmark of all voltage-gated channels in eukaryotic cells (7,(35)(36)(37).”
From Cch1 Restores Intracellular Ca2+ in Fungal Cells during Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress (2010) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 56
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Gonzalez, 2004, Displacement of S3 segment during activation of Shaker K+ channel with a short S3–S4 linker, Biophys. J., 86, 123a
Metadata
- Authors
- Durell, S. R., Shrivastava, I. H., & Guy, H. R.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Guy, H. Robert
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2116-2130
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC1304639
- OpenAlex
- W2120570952
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Keywords
- Shaker potassium channel, voltage-gated potassium channels, transmembrane domain, extracellular domain, ion channel mutations, membrane protein structure
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Binding Sites, Computer Simulation, Humans, Models, Biological, Models, Chemical, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Structure-Activity Relationship, Potassium Channels, Ion Channel Gating, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Potassium Channels, Voltage-Gated, Shaker Superfamily of Potassium Channels
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review