Cited by 156Electrostatics and Colloid InteractionsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsElectrical and Electromagnetic Research

Dielectric measurement of individual microtubules using the electroorientation method

Open access
Minoura, Itsushi, Muto, Etsuko·2006·Biophysical Journal

Abstract

Little is known about the electrostatic/dynamic properties of microtubules, which are considered to underlie their electrostatic interactions with various proteins such as motor proteins, microtubule-associated proteins, and microtubules themselves (lateral association of microtubules). To measure the dielectric properties of microtubules, we developed an experiment system in which the electroorientation of microtubules was observed under a dark-field microscope. Upon application of an alternating electric field (0.5-1.9 x 10(5) V/m, 10 kHz-3 MHz), the microtubules were oriented parallel to the field line in a few seconds because of the dipole moment induced along their long axes. The process of this orientation was analyzed based on a dielectric ellipsoid model, and the conductivity and dielectric constant of each microtubule were calculated. The analyses revealed that the microtubules were highly conductive, which is consistent with the counterion polarization model-counterions bound to highly negatively charged microtubules can move along the long axis, and this mobility might be the origin of the high conductivity. Our experiment system provides a useful tool to quantitatively evaluate the polyelectrolyte nature of microtubules, thus paving the way for future studies aiming to understand the physicochemical mechanism underlying the electrostatic interactions of microtubules with various proteins.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1529/biophysj.105.071324

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 156

Authors
Minoura, I., & Muto, E.
Affiliations
RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
Corresponding author
Muto, Etsuko
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
90
Issue
10
Pages
3739-3748
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965343724
Cited by
156
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Electrical and Electromagnetic Research
Keywords
microtubules, dielectric properties, AC electric field, dielectric constant, electrical conductivity, polyelectrolytes, microtubule-associated proteins, dark-field microscopy
MeSH terms
Electrochemistry, Microtubules, Protein Conformation, Electric Impedance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review