Diagnostic testing of autonomous cortisol secretion in adrenal incidentalomas
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) is a condition with ACTH-independent cortisol overproduction from adrenal incidentalomas (AI) or adrenal hyperplasia. The hypercortisolism is often mild, and most patients lack typical clinical features of overt Cushing's syndrome (CS). ACS is not well defined and diagnostic tests lack validation. METHODS: Retrospective study of 165 patients with AI evaluated clinically and by assay of morning plasma ACTH, late-night saliva cortisol, serum DHEA sulphate (DHEAS), 24-h urine-free cortisol, and cortisol after dexamethasone suppression. RESULTS: Patients with AI (n = 165) were diagnosed as non-functioning incidentalomas (NFI) (n = 82) or ACS (n = 83) according to current European guidelines. Late-night saliva cortisol discriminated poorly between NFI and ACS, showing a high rate of false-positive (23/63) and false-negative (38/69) results. The conventional low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (LDDST) did not improve the diagnostic specificity, compared with the 1 mg overnight DST. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of DHEAS in the two cohorts demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.76 (P < 0.01) with a sensitivity for ACS of 58% and a specificity of 80% using the recommended cutoff at 1.04 µmol/L (40 µg/dL). CONCLUSION: We here demonstrate in a large retrospective cohort of incidentaloma patients, that neither DHEAS, late-night saliva cortisol nor 24-h urine free cortisol are useful to discriminate between non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas and ACS. The conventional LDDST do not add further information compared with the 1 mg overnight DST. Alternative biomarkers are needed to improve the diagnostic workup of ACS.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LC-MS/MS has only been used three times before for measuring LNSC in patients with adrenal incidentaloma.
“To our knowledge, LC-MS/MS has only been used three times before for measuring LNSC in patients with adrenal incidentaloma (12, 15, 16).”
From The diagnostic value of salivary cortisol and salivary cortisone in patients with suspected hypercortisolism (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
The limited number of studies published to date have shown that LNSC has a relatively low sensitivity for predicting ACS, and subsequently conclude that the test is not suitable for screening of this disorder.
“The limited number of studies published to date have shown that LNSC has a relatively low sensitivity for predicting ACS, and subsequently conclude that the test is not suitable for screening of this disorder (11–16).”
From The diagnostic value of salivary cortisol and salivary cortisone in patients with suspected hypercortisolism (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
All previous studies, regardless of analytical assay, have concluded that LNSC cannot be recommended as an exclusive screening method for ACS.
“In fact, due to the low sensitivity, all previous studies, regardless of analytical assay, have concluded that LNSC cannot be recommended as an exclusive screening method for ACS (11–16).”
From The diagnostic value of salivary cortisol and salivary cortisone in patients with suspected hypercortisolism (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Ueland, G. Å., Grinde, T., Methlie, P., Kelp, O., Løvås, K., & Husebye, E. S.
- Affiliations
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Akershus University Hospital (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Ueland, Grethe Å
- Venue
- Endocrine Connections
- Publisher
- Bioscientifica
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 963-970
- ISSN
- 2049-3614 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7576642
- OpenAlex
- W3086920131
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 4.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Endocrine Connections (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18OC0034130, NNF14OC0011005)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- autonomous cortisol secretion, adrenal incidentaloma, ACTH-independent Cushing's syndrome, dexamethasone suppression test, DHEA sulfate, 24-hour urine free cortisol, diagnostic biomarkers, adrenal hyperplasia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review