Effects of oral contraceptives on metabolic parameters in adult premenopausal women: a meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To estimate the effect of oral contraceptives (OC) containing different progestins on parameters of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients and methods: Premenopausal women aged 18 or older, who received oral contraceptives containing chlormadinone, cyproterone, drospirenone, levonorgestrel, desogestrel, dienogest, gestodene or norgestimate, for at least 3 months. Outcome variables were changes in plasma lipids, BMI, insulin resistance and plasma glucose. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for randomized trials and estimated the pooled within-group change in each outcome variable using a random-effects model. We performed subgroup analyses by study duration (<12 months vs ≥12 months) and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) status. Results: Eighty-two clinical trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All progestins (except dienogest) increased plasma TG, ranging from 12.1 mg/dL for levonorgestrel ( P < 0.001) to 35.1 mg/dL for chlormadinone ( P < 0.001). Most progestins also increased HDLc, with the largest effect observed for chlormadinone (+9.6 mg/dL, P < 0.001) and drospirenone (+7.4 mg/dL, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, levonorgestrel decreased HDLc by 4.4 mg/dL ( P < 0.001). Levonorgestrel (+6.8 mg/dL, P < 0.001) and norgestimate (+11.5 mg/dL, P = 0.003) increased LDLc, while dienogest decreased it (–7.7 mg/dL, P = 0.04). Cyproterone slightly reduced plasma glucose. None of the progestins affected BMI or HOMA-IR. Similar results were observed in subgroups defined by PCOS or study duration. Conclusion: Most progestins increase both TG and HDLc, their effect on LDLc varies widely. OC have minor or no effects on BMI, HOMA-IR and glycemia. The antiandrogen progestins dienogest and cyproterone displayed the most favorable metabolic profile, while levonorgestrel displayed the least favorable.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exogenous ovarian hormones appear to exert greater effects on glucose flux during exercise than endogenous hormones, as decreases in rates of glucose appearance and disappearance are observed in recently fed women using combined oral contraceptives compared to before COC use.
“Exogenous ovarian hormones appear to exert greater effects on glucose flux during exercise than endogenous hormones, as decreases in rates of glucose appearance and disappearance can be observed in recently fed women using combined oral contraceptives (COC) compared to before COC use [178].”
From International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutritional concerns of the female athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [178]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 93 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Silva-Bermudez, L. S., Toloza, F. J. K., Perez-Matos, M. C., de Souza, R. J., Banfield, L., Vargas-Villanueva, A., & Mendivil, C. O.
- Affiliations
- 1School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
- Universidad de Los Andes (CO)
- 2Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Mendivil, Carlos O
- Venue
- Endocrine Connections
- Publisher
- Bioscientifica
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 978-998
- ISSN
- 2049-3614 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7576645
- OpenAlex
- W3085013744
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Endocrine Connections (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- oral contraceptives, progestins, lipid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, insulin resistance, plasma glucose, body mass index, polycystic ovary syndrome, levonorgestrel, dienogest, cyproterone, chlormadinone, drospirenone, norgestimate, desogestrel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review