Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Progression of medullary thyroid carcinoma: assessment with calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen doubling times

Laure Giraudet, Anne, Al Ghulzan, Abir, Aupérin, Anne, Leboulleux, Sophie, Chehboun, Ahmed, Troalen, Frédéric, Dromain, Clarisse, Lumbroso, Jean, Baudin, Eric, Schlumberger, Martin·2008·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Objective: The progression of medullary thyroid cancer is difficult to assess with imaging modalities; we studied the interest of calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) doubling times and of Ki-67 labeling and mitotic index (MI). Patients and methods: Fifty-five consecutive medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) patients with elevated calcitonin levels underwent repeated imaging studies in order to assess tumor burden and progression status. We looked for relationships between tumor burden and levels of calcitonin and CEA and between progression status according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) and calcitonin and CEA doubling times, and Ki-67 labeling and MI. Results: The calcitonin and CEA levels were correlated with tumor burden. Ten patients with calcitonin levels below 816 pg/ml had no imaged tumor foci. Among the 45 patients with imaged tumor foci, 19 had stable disease and 26 had progressive disease, according to the RECIST. The calcitonin and CEA doubling times were strongly related to disease progression, with very few overlaps: 94% of patients with doubling times shorter than 25 months had progressive disease and 86% of patients with doubling times longer than 24 months had stable disease. Ki-67 labeling and MI were not significantly associated with disease progression. Conclusion: For MTC patients, the doubling times of both calcitonin and CEA are efficient tools for assessing tumor progression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje-07-0667

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Laure Giraudet, A., Al Ghulzan, A., Aupérin, A., Leboulleux, S., Chehboun, A., Troalen, F., Dromain, C., Lumbroso, J., Baudin, E., & Schlumberger, M.
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2008-02
Volume
158
Issue
2
Pages
239-246
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2164124089
Cited by
272
References
1
FWCI
11.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progression of medullary thyroid carcinoma: assessment with calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen doubling times. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1530/eje-07-0667
The paper
Laure Giraudet, A., Al Ghulzan, A., Aupérin, A., Leboulleux, S., Chehboun, A., Troalen, F., Dromain, C., Lumbroso, J., Baudin, E., & Schlumberger, M. (2008). Progression of medullary thyroid carcinoma: assessment with calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen doubling times. European Journal of Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-07-0667

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.