Cited by 69Ovarian function and disordersAdrenal Hormones and DisordersSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Defining hyperandrogenism in polycystic ovary syndrome: measurement of testosterone and androstenedione by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry and analysis by receiver operator characteristic plots

Barth, Julian H, Field, Helen P, Yasmin, Ephia, Balen, Adam H·2010·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Objective: Hyperandrogenism is one of the diagnostic criteria for the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) despite no agreed definition of hyperandrogenism. In part, this is due to the quality of testosterone immunoassays. We have developed liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry methods for analysing testosterone and androstenedione (Ad) to study their reference ranges and diagnostic utility in PCOS. Design, setting and subjects: A consecutive series of 122 women attending a reproductive medicine clinic. Methods: Blood samples were taken during the early follicular phase for measurement of LH, FSH, oestradiol, Ad, testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Retrospective case note analysis was used to determine the clinical features and ultrasound findings. Results: The incidence of PCOS was 13.9%. The reference interval for testosterone was <1.8 nmol/l and for Ad was 1.4–7.4 nmol/l. There were significant differences in total testosterone (P=0.001), Ad (P<0.05) and free androgen index (FAI; P<0.0001) between the women with and without PCOS. Diagnostic performance using receiver operator characteristic plots showed area under the curve (AUC) for FAI 0.81, testosterone 0.75 and Ad 0.66. The AUC for the LH:FSH ratio was 0.72. Conclusions: Our analysis of a consecutive series of women attending a reproductive clinic has provided an appropriate series on which to construct reference ranges for key androgens in women. Secondly, it has allowed us to conclude that early follicular serum testosterone measured using tandem mass spectrometry, FAI and the LH:FSH ratio are valuable laboratory tests in the diagnosis of PCOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje-09-0741

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barth, J. H., Field, H. P., Yasmin, E., & Balen, A. H.
Affiliations
Leeds General Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Barth, Julian H
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2010-03
Volume
162
Issue
3
Pages
611-615
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2169949390
Cited by
69
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, hyperandrogenism, testosterone, androstenedione, free androgen index, LH/FSH ratio, reference values, PCOS diagnosis, sex hormone-binding globulin
MeSH terms
Adult, Androstenedione, Chromatography, Liquid, Female, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Reference Values, ROC Curve, Testosterone, Hyperandrogenism, Area Under Curve, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review