Adrenocortical carcinoma: is the surgical approach a risk factor of peritoneal carcinomatosis?
Abstract
CONTEXT: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a rare site of distant metastases in patients with adrenocortical cancer (ACC). One preliminary study suggests an increased risk of PC after laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for ACC. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to search for risk factors of PC including surgical approach. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in an institutional practice. PATIENTS: Sixty-four consecutive patients with ACC seen at our institution between 2003 and 2009 were included. Mean tumor size was 132 mm. Patients had stage I disease in 2 cases, stage II disease in 32 cases, stage III disease in 7 cases, stage IV disease in 21 cases, and unknown stage disease in 2 cases. Surgery was open in 58 cases and laparoscopic in 6 cases. MAIN OUTCOME: The main outcome was the risk factors of PC. RESULTS: PC occurred in 18 (28%) patients. It was present at initial diagnosis in three cases and occurred during follow-up in 15 cases. The only risk factor of PC occurring during follow-up was the surgical approach with a 4-year rate of PC of 67% (95% confidence interval (CI), 30-90%) for LA and 27% (95% CI, 15-44%) for open adrenalectomy (P=0.016). Neither tumor size, stage, functional status, completeness of surgery, nor plasma level of op'DDD was associated with the occurrence of PC. CONCLUSION: We found an increased risk of PC after LA for ACC. Whether this is related to an inappropriate surgical approach or to insufficient experience in ACC surgery should be clarified by a prospective program.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a study by Leboulleux et al, peritoneal carcinomatosis occurred in 25% of patients treated by OA, as opposed to 60% of patients who underwent LA.
“In a study by Leboulleux et al (258), peritoneal carcinomatosis occurred in only 25% of patients treated by OA, as opposed to 60% of patients who underwent LA.”
From Adrenocortical carcinoma (2014) · cites this paper as [258]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 133
- Authors
- Leboulleux, S., Deandreis, D., Al Ghuzlan, A., Aupérin, A., Goéré, D., Dromain, C., Elias, D., Caillou, B., Travagli, J. P., De Baere, T., Lumbroso, J., Young, J., Schlumberger, M., & Baudin, E.
- Affiliations
- Institut Gustave Roussy (FR)
- Bicêtre Hospital (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Leboulleux, S
- Venue
- European Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1147-1153
- ISSN
- 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-683X
- OpenAlex
- W2153694652
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 11.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
- 12th European Congress of Endocrinology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Keywords
- adrenocortical carcinoma, peritoneal carcinomatosis, laparoscopic adrenalectomy, open adrenalectomy, surgical approach, risk factors, distant metastasis, adrenalectomy
- MeSH terms
- Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms, Adrenalectomy, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Laparoscopy, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Adrenocortical Carcinoma, Patient Selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review