Cognitive effects of aromatase inhibitor therapy in peripubertal boys
Abstract
Objective: Aromatase inhibitors, blockers of oestrogen biosynthesis, have emerged as a new potential treatment modality for boys with short stature. The cognitive effects of such therapy are unknown. In this study, we explored the effects of aromatase inhibition on cognitive performance in peripubertal boys. Design: Prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical study. Methods: Twenty-eight boys, aged 9.0–14.5 years, with idiopathic short stature were treated with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole (2.5 mg/day) or placebo, for 2 years. During the treatment, the progression of physical signs of puberty and the concentrations of sex hormones were followed up. A selection of cognitive tests, focusing on memory function, was administered to the participants at entry, at 12 months and at 24 months after the start of the treatment. Results: Letrozole effectively inhibited the conversion of androgen to oestrogen, as indicated by high serum testosterone and low serum oestradiol concentrations in letrozole-treated boys who progressed into puberty. In both the groups, there was a gain in performance during the follow-up period in tests of verbal performance, in most of the tests of visuospatial performance and in some tests of verbal memory. No significant differences between the letrozole- and placebo-treated boys in development of cognitive performance were found in any of the tests during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Our results suggest that blockade of oestrogen biosynthesis with an aromatase inhibitor does not influence cognitive performance in peripubertal males.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The combination with a GnRH analog in order to prevent this increase did not yield beneficial results either.
“The combination with a GnRH analog in order to prevent this increase did not yield beneficial results either [72].”
From Aromatase inhibitors in men: effects and therapeutic options (2011) · cites this paper as [72]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 41 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Hero, M., Maury, S., Luotoniemi, E., Service, E., & Dunkel, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Hero, M
- Venue
- European Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-155
- ISSN
- 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-683X
- OpenAlex
- W2155901562
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Helsingin Yliopisto
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Keywords
- aromatase inhibitors, letrozole, idiopathic short stature, cognitive performance, memory, estradiol, testosterone, puberty, sex hormones, verbal performance, visuospatial performance
- MeSH terms
- Letrozole, Adolescent, Child, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Growth Disorders, Humans, Male, Nitriles, Triazoles, Aromatase Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review