A thyroxine absorption test followed by weekly thyroxine administration: a method to assess non-adherence to treatment
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: For patients who remain hypothyroid despite the administration of what would seem adequate doses of levothyroxine (L-T4), the underlying cause can be difficult to determine. The possibility of a biological cause should first be explored; however, in the majority of cases, poor adherence to medication is likely to be the main cause of treatment failure. When non-adherence is suspected but not volunteered, options to confirm the suspicion are limited. In this study, we identified patients for whom known drugs and pathological causes of L-T4 malabsorption were excluded, and despite often high doses of L-T4, the patients remained hypothyroid. DESIGN: Using a weight-determined oral L-T4 bolus administration, absorption was initially assessed in 23 patients. In nearly all patients, this was shown to be maximal at 120 min post-ingestion. This was then followed by the continued administration of a weekly T4 bolus for a 4-week period after which TSH and free T4 (fT4) levels were recorded. RESULTS: All patients showed a rise in fT4 at 120 min following the administration of the L-T4 bolus, with a mean increase of 54±3% from baseline. Following the treatment period, using an equivalent weekly L-T4 dose, which was significantly less than that of the daily dose taken by the patients before the test, TSH reduced from baseline in ~75% of cases. CONCLUSION: Using this combination of tests allows significant malabsorptive problems to be identified first and then potential non-adherence to be demonstrated. A management plan can then be implemented to increase adherence, aiming to improve treatment outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Walker, J. N., Shillo, P., Ibbotson, V, Vincent, A., Karavitaki, N., Weetman, A. P., Wass, J. A. H., & Allahabadia, A.
- Affiliations
- Royal Hallamshire Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Walker, J N
- Venue
- European Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 913-917
- ISSN
- 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-683X
- OpenAlex
- W2107043610
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Keywords
- levothyroxine, medication non-adherence, hypothyroidism, treatment failure, free thyroxine, thyroid-stimulating hormone, drug malabsorption
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review