Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The epidemiology of pituitary adenomas in Iceland, 1955–2012: a nationwide population-based study

Agustsson, Tomas Thor, Baldvinsdottir, Tinna, Jonasson, Jon G, Olafsdottir, Elinborg, Steinthorsdottir, Valgerdur, Sigurdsson, Gunnar, Thorsson, Arni V, Carroll, Paul V, Korbonits, Márta, Benediktsson, Rafn·2015·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Objective: Pituitary adenomas (PA) are among the most common human neoplasms. To describe the epidemiology and assess the disease burden of clinically significant PAs, population-based studies are needed. Iceland has a small well-defined population. The aim of this study is to describe the epidemiology of PAs in Iceland over an expanded period of time. Design: This is a retrospective observational study, including all PAs diagnosed in Iceland from 1955 to 2012. Methods: Extensive clinical information was gathered in a database. Prevalence rates for all PA subtypes were calculated along with standardized incidence rates (SIR). Sex ratios and relationships with adenoma size, age, and symptoms were assessed. Results: We identified 471 individuals: 190 men and 281 women. Total prevalence in 2012 was 115.57/100 000, prolactinomas were most prevalent (54.37/100 000) followed by non-functioning adenomas (NFPAs) (42.32/100 000). Throughout the period, NFPAs were most common (43.0%) followed by prolactinomas (39.9%) and 11.3% had acromegaly and 5.7% Cushing's disease. Women are diagnosed younger with smaller adenomas. Total SIR has increased significantly and is now 5.8/100 000 per year. Conclusion: In this nationwide study spanning six decades, we have confirmed PAs rising prevalence and incidence rates noted in recent studies. We demonstrated higher overall prevalence and incidence rates than ever previously recorded with an increasing predominance of NFPAs, which is not explained by incidental findings alone. There is a relationship with the introduction of imaging modalities, but the vast majority of patients are symptomatic at diagnosis. This underlines the importance of increased awareness, education, and appropriate allocation of resources for this growing group of patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje-15-0189

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Agustsson, T. T., Baldvinsdottir, T., Jonasson, J. G., Olafsdottir, E., Steinthorsdottir, V., Sigurdsson, G., Thorsson, A. V., Carroll, P. V., Korbonits, M., & Benediktsson, R.
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2015-11
Volume
173
Issue
5
Pages
655-664
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2238072587
Cited by
347
References
1
FWCI
15.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The epidemiology of pituitary adenomas in Iceland, 1955–2012: a nationwide population-based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1530/eje-15-0189
The paper
Agustsson, T. T., Baldvinsdottir, T., Jonasson, J. G., Olafsdottir, E., Steinthorsdottir, V., Sigurdsson, G., Thorsson, A. V., Carroll, P. V., Korbonits, M., & Benediktsson, R. (2015). The epidemiology of pituitary adenomas in Iceland, 1955–2012: a nationwide population-based study. European Journal of Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-15-0189

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.