Cited by 94Pituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Diagnosis of endocrine disease: pituitary stalk interruption syndrome: etiology and clinical manifestations

Vergier, Julia, Castinetti, Frederic, Saveanu, Alexandru, Girard, Nadine, Brue, Thierry, Reynaud, Rachel·2019·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (PSIS) is a congenital pituitary anatomical defect. This syndrome is an antenatal developmental defect belonging to the holoprosencephaly phenotype spectrum. It is heterogeneous regarding clinical, biological and radiological presentation and is characterized by the following triad: thin (<1 mm) or interrupted pituitary stalk connecting the hypothalamus to the pituitary gland, no eutopic posterior lobe, and hypoplasia or aplasia of the anterior lobe. This review reports current knowledge about the composite pathogenesis, for which underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Current data suggest genetic origins involving early developmental gene mutations with complex inheritance patterns and environmental influence, placing PSIS at the crossroads between Mendelian and multifactorial diseases. The phenotype associated with PSIS is highly heterogeneous with a high incidence of various combinations of hormonal deficiencies, sometimes associated with extra-pituitary birth defects. The age at onset is variable, but typical presentation is evolutive combined anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies at pediatric age, which progress even during adulthood to panhypopituitarism. Therefore, patients’ follow-up throughout life is essential for adequate management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje-19-0168

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vergier, J., Castinetti, F., Saveanu, A., Girard, N., Brue, T., & Reynaud, R.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • 1Aix-Marseille Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1251, Marseille Medical Genetics (MMG), Marseille, France
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Vergier, Julia
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2019-11
Volume
181
Issue
5
Pages
R199-R209
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2977128302
Cited by
94
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
pituitary stalk interruption syndrome, holoprosencephaly, anterior pituitary hypoplasia, panhypopituitarism, etiology, genetic inheritance, multifactorial inheritance, pediatric endocrinology, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Humans, Hypopituitarism, Phenotype, Pituitary Diseases, Pituitary Gland, Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review